IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pid/journl/v42y2003i4p823-838.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Net Gains from Conjunctive Use of Surface and Ground Water

Author

Listed:
  • Waqar A. Jehangir

    (International Water Management Institute, Lahore.)

  • Hugh Turral

    (International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.)

  • Shahbaz Khan

    (CSIRO (Land and Water), Griffth, NSW, Australia.)

Abstract

Pakistan is fortunate enough because its soils, topography and climate are generally suitable for farming but its agriculture sector faces the problem of scarcity of the irrigation water. This paucity of irrigation supplies has forced the farmers to use the ground water to augment their surface supplies. The quality of ground water in Pakistan varies from fit for irrigation to moderately saline to sodic. Thus the tubewell owners in the marginal quality ground water areas are bound to use the tubewell water in conjunction with the surface water on their farms. Currently the farmers are using about 65.75 BCM of ground water in Pakistan [Halcrow (2002)]. The international literature is filled with the studies on conjunctive water management and its impact on crop productivity and related issues [Gangwar and Toorn (1987); Bredehoeft and Young (1983); Gorelick (1988); Lingen (1988); O’Mara (1988); Shah (1988); Brewer and Sharma (2000); Datta and Dayal (2000); Raju and Brewer (2000); Sakhtivadivel and Chawala (2002) and Chaudhary and Shah (2003)]. In Pakistan, the review of literature shows that all of the previous studies conducted in the arena of water management reported the management problems leading to the inefficiencies in irrigation application and reduction in crop productivity, [Kijne and Velde (1991); Mustafa (1991) and Siddiq (1994)]. Few of the studies took into consideration the impact of waterlogging and salinity on productivity at farm level [Meyer, et al. (1996); Prathaper, et al. (1997) and O’Connell and Khan (1999)]. None of these studies have taken into consideration the trade-offs between gross farm income, ground water and salinity at irrigation subdivision level. To answer the issues of spatial differences in the trade offs between gross farm income, ground water and salinity at irrigation Subdivision level, this paper presents the results of the optimisation modeling at the Subdivisional level

Suggested Citation

  • Waqar A. Jehangir & Hugh Turral & Shahbaz Khan, 2003. "Net Gains from Conjunctive Use of Surface and Ground Water," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 42(4), pages 823-838.
  • Handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:42:y:2003:i:4:p:823-838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pide.org.pk/pdf/PDR/2003/Volume4/823-838.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Datta, K.K. & Dayal, Bhu, 2000. "Irrigation with Poor Quality Water: An Impirical Study of Input Use, Economic Loss, and Coping Strategies," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 55(1), March.
    2. Brewer, J. D. & Sharma, K. R., 2000. "Conjunctive management in the Hardinath Irrigation System, Nepal," IWMI Research Reports H026071, International Water Management Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jehangir, Waqar Ahmed & Ashfaq, Muhammad & Christen, Evan, 2003. "Alternate Modes of Irrigation and Farmer Returns Under Conjunctive Water Management in Pakistan," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 11.
    2. Barmon, Basanta Kumar, 2016. "Impacts of the Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation System on Modern Varieties of Paddy Production in Bangladesh: A Case Study of Jessore District," Bangladesh Development Studies, Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS), vol. 39(3-4), pages 77-104, sept-dec.
    3. Haque, T., 2006. "Resource Use Efficiency in Indian Agriculture," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 61(1), pages 1-12.
    4. Jehangir, W. A. & Khan, S. & Ashfaq, M. & Mudasser, M., 2003. "Economics of conjunctive water management in Pakistan," IWMI Books, Reports H033390, International Water Management Institute.
    5. Jehangir, W. A. & Khan, Shahbaz & Ashfaq, Muhammad & Mudasser, M., 2003. "Economics of conjunctive water management in Pakistan," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:42:y:2003:i:4:p:823-838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Khurram Iqbal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pideipk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.