Author
Abstract
The economy-wide effects of the asean Free Trade Area (afta) on the Philippine economy are computed using the Global Trade Analysis Project (gtap) model of the world economy. Of the 40 industries representing the Philippine economy that were simulated to assess the impacts of afta on sectoral output, 24 industries declined. However, the order of magnitudes of the percentage declines is low, except for rice, whose output decreased by about 4.5 percent. Notwithstanding the contraction of production in the majority of industries, the country comes out a net gainer in aggregate output by around 1.4 percent in total gross domestic product. This implies that, overall, the Philippines is slightly better off with the preferential trade liberalization, with an equivalent variation gain of us$237.4 million. Considerable movement of workers across industries is observed. Reductions in skilled worker employment resulted in 31 industries, and 35 industries do the same in the case of unskilled labor. There is no change in unemployment due to the fact that the empirical model assumes full employment of productive factors. Given the fact that there is a change in employment patterns during trade liberalization episodes, it is important to assess the empirical relationship between trade liberalization and unemployment which remains difficult to pin down. The empirical literature in developing countries shows that the employment response of trade reforms is dependent on infrastructure, trade facilitation measures, and other policies. Therefore, policies related to providing information and new market opportunities, organizing value chains, facilitating coordinated investments along the chain, clustering of related small and medium enterprises to boost external economies, and providing information to employers and workers of job opportunities, including training, are important.
Suggested Citation
Ramon L. Clarete & Philip Arnold O. Tuano, 2015.
"Goods trade liberalization under the ASEAN Economic Community: effects on the Philippine economy,"
Philippine Review of Economics, University of the Philippines School of Economics and Philippine Economic Society, vol. 52(2), pages 210-233, December.
Handle:
RePEc:phs:prejrn:v:52:y:2015:i:2:p:210-233
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phs:prejrn:v:52:y:2015:i:2:p:210-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RT Campos (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seupdph.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.