IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pfq/journl/v56y2011i4p518-538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Better Life Index of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

Author

Listed:
  • Kerényi, Ádám

Abstract

Among economists the following questions arise: Will new measures of well-being1 be any more meaningful than tradi-tional indicators? Is the new focus on quality of life a welcome recognition that governments can and should promote happiness?In my study I introduce the OECD’s so-called Better Life Index, which was launched on 24 May 2011 and aims to measure well-being and progress. The index allows citizens to compare well-being1 across 34 countries in 11 topics – housing, income, jobs, community, education, environment, governance, health, life satisfaction, safety and work-life balance – giving their own weight to each of the topics. In this document I tend to focus on and show charts relating to the data and ranks concerning Hungary. Over the past 50 years, the OECD has developed a rich set of recommendations on policies that can best support economic growth. The task for economists is to develop an equally rich menu of recommendations on policies to support societal progress: better policies for better lives. The success of the OECD’s recent publication depends on its application and on its ability to give coherent shape to incoherent reality and asymmetric public policy objectives. Surely the quality of life, as people experience it, has got to be a key measure of progress and a central objective for any government.

Suggested Citation

  • Kerényi, Ádám, 2011. "The Better Life Index of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development," Public Finance Quarterly, Corvinus University of Budapest, vol. 56(4), pages 518-538.
    • Handle: RePEc:pfq:journl:v:56:y:2011:i:4:p:518-538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://unipub.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/9010/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles I. Jones & Peter J. Klenow, 2016. "Beyond GDP? Welfare across Countries and Time," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(9), pages 2426-2457, September.
    2. Daniel Kahneman & Alan B. Krueger, 2006. "Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-Being," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 20(1), pages 3-24, Winter.
    3. Bentham, Jeremy, 1781. "An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number bentham1781.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Blog mentions

    As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
    1. Cum stai cu...starea de bine?
      by Alina Botezat in Alina Botezat Blog on 2012-05-23 14:49:00

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Papageorgiou, Athanasios, 2018. "The Effect of Immigration on the Well-Being of Native Populations: Evidence from the United Kingdom," MPRA Paper 93045, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Zhang, Yinjunjie & Xu, Zhicheng Phil & Palma, Marco A., 2017. "Misclassification Errors of Subjective Well-being: A New Approach to Mapping Happiness," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258553, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Filip Fors & Joakim Kulin, 2016. "Bringing Affect Back in: Measuring and Comparing Subjective Well-Being Across Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 127(1), pages 323-339, May.
    4. Rauf Gönenç & Oliver Röhn & Christian Beer & Andreas Wörgötter, 2013. "Responding to Key Well-being Challenges in Austria," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1080, OECD Publishing.
    5. DECANCQ, Koen & FLEURBAEY, Marc & SCHOKKAERT, Erik, 2014. "Inequality, income, and well-being," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2014018, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    6. Yuta J. Masuda & Jason R. Williams & Heather Tallis, 2021. "Does Life Satisfaction Vary with Time and Income? Investigating the Relationship Among Free Time, Income, and Life Satisfaction," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 2051-2073, June.
    7. Murtin, Fabrice & Boarini, Romina & Cordoba, Juan Carlos & Ripoll, Marla, 2017. "Beyond GDP: Is there a law of one shadow price?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 390-411.
    8. Mukuria, Clara & Brazier, John, 2013. "Valuing the EQ-5D and the SF-6D health states using subjective well-being: A secondary analysis of patient data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 97-105.
    9. Norbert Hirschauer & Mira Lehberger & Oliver Musshoff, 2015. "Happiness and Utility in Economic Thought—Or: What Can We Learn from Happiness Research for Public Policy Analysis and Public Policy Making?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 647-674, April.
    10. Nicola Glover-Thomas, 2020. "A ‘Wellbeing’ Paradigm: A Concept-Based Study of Body Art and Regulatory Challenges," Laws, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Thomas Carver & Arthur Grimes, 2019. "Income or Consumption: Which Better Predicts Subjective Well‐Being?," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 65(S1), pages 256-280, November.
    12. Cosimato, Silvia & Faggini, Marisa & Prete, Marzia del, 2021. "The co-creation of value for pursuing a sustainable happiness: The analysis of an Italian prison community," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    13. Bruno Frey, 2012. "Well-being and war," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 59(4), pages 363-375, December.
    14. Jonas De Vos & Patricia L. Mokhtarian & Tim Schwanen & Veronique Van Acker & Frank Witlox, 2016. "Travel mode choice and travel satisfaction: bridging the gap between decision utility and experienced utility," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 771-796, September.
    15. Luca D’Acci, 2013. "Hedonic Inertia and Underground Happiness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 113(3), pages 1237-1259, September.
    16. Baylis, Patrick, 2020. "Temperature and temperament: Evidence from Twitter," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    17. Christopher Barrington-Leigh & Alice Escande, 2018. "Measuring Progress and Well-Being: A Comparative Review of Indicators," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 893-925, February.
    18. Stefano Carattini & Matthias Roesti, 2020. "Trust, Happiness, and Pro-Social Behavior," CESifo Working Paper Series 8562, CESifo.
    19. Luca D’Acci, 2011. "Measuring Well-Being and Progress," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 104(1), pages 47-65, October.
    20. Luisa Corrado & Giuseppe De Michele, 2019. "Are governments matching citizens’ demand for better lives? A new approach comparing subjective and objective welfare measures," Working Papers 39, European Stability Mechanism.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    well-being; indicators; OECD;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • I20 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pfq:journl:v:56:y:2011:i:4:p:518-538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam Hoffmann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bkeeehu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.