IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pet/annals/v9i2y2009p127-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Cash-Flow Statement - Between True and Manipulation

Author

Listed:
  • Ovidiu Megan

    (West University of Timisoara, Romania)

  • Camelia Haţegan

    (West University of Timisoara, Romania)

  • Leonora Caciuc

    (West University of Timisoara, Romania)

  • Bogdan Cotleţ

    (West University of Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

Financial statements aim is to assure an efficient dialogue between the company and the external operators interested in having a good perspective of the entity. Information about the cash flows, as component of financial statements, is useful in providing users of financial statements with a basis to assess the ability of the entity to generate cash and cash equivalents and the needs of the entity to utilize those cash flows. The objective of our paper is to present the main informational valences of cash-flow statement for investors and also to show the potential “make-up actions” made to give wrong information about a company for the decision makers. For this purpose we will use a research methodology based on a research study by questionnaire on a sample of small and medium enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Ovidiu Megan & Camelia Haţegan & Leonora Caciuc & Bogdan Cotleţ, 2009. "The Cash-Flow Statement - Between True and Manipulation," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 9(2), pages 127-136.
    • Handle: RePEc:pet:annals:v:9:i:2:y:2009:p:127-136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://upet.ro/annals/economics/pdf/2009/20090217.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hategan Camelia Daniela & Predictor of Insolvency Risk, 2018. "Auditor's Uncertainty About Going Concern – Predictor of Insolvency Risk," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 605-610, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pet:annals:v:9:i:2:y:2009:p:127-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Imola Driga (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.upet.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.