IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pet/annals/v8i1y2008p295-300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Manageability Comparison: Oracle Database 10g and Oracle 9i Database

Author

Listed:
  • Ion Lungu

    (Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Teodora Vătuiu

    (Free International University of Moldova, Chişinău, Moldova)

Abstract

In this paper we performed a basic and common DBA tasks on the two products and measured the time taken and the steps required to complete each task, to assess their relative manageability. The time taken to complete the tasks was then weighted according to their frequency of use in a typical DBA workday to arrive at an overall time savings percentage.

Suggested Citation

  • Ion Lungu & Teodora Vătuiu, 2008. "Manageability Comparison: Oracle Database 10g and Oracle 9i Database," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 8(1), pages 295-300.
    • Handle: RePEc:pet:annals:v:8:i:1:y:2008:p:295-300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upet.ro/annals/pdf/Annals-2008-Part1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Teodora Vătuiu & Mioara Udrică & Naiana Tarcă, 2013. "Cloud Computing Technology - Optimal Solution for Efficient Use of Business Intelligence and Enterprise Resource Planning Applications," Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, ScientificPapers.org, vol. 3(6), pages 1-28, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    manageability comparison; software application; management system;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D8 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pet:annals:v:8:i:1:y:2008:p:295-300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Imola Driga (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.upet.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.