IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pcz/journl/v13y2016i1p7-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Innovative Methodology For Supporting The Clld

Author

Listed:
  • Gyorgy Aldorfai

    (Szent István University, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences)

  • Lilla Czabadai

    (Szent István University, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences)

  • Zoltan Topa

    (Szent István University, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences)

Abstract

Based on the LEADER initiative, the European Union created a new tool for the planning period 2014-2020: the Community Lead Local Development (CLLD). Both the LEADER and the CLLD programmes put great emphasis on studying the basic situation, but there is no universal methodology provided for it, which makes it almost impossible to compare regions with each other. Therefore, this study aims to provide a way to compare regional characteristics and indicators in the current planning period of the EU, which allows us to monitor the development path of the regions, and also the performance of regional development programmes. This study investigates a smaller region, as a test of our chosen method for later and larger investigations. Through the applied methodology important elements belonging to the CLLD, such as the indicators for life quality, organisational efficiency, sectoral performance and infrastructure, were examined. The output of the research is intended to provide a suitable tool for decision makers to compare different regional levels more efficiently

Suggested Citation

  • Gyorgy Aldorfai & Lilla Czabadai & Zoltan Topa, 2016. "An Innovative Methodology For Supporting The Clld," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 13(1), pages 7-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:pcz:journl:v:13:y:2016:i:1:p:7-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pjms.zim.pcz.pl/PDF/PJMS131/An%20Innovative%20Methodology%20for%20Supporting%20the%20CLLD.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://pjms.zim.pcz.pl/-articles-13.1.php
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ma³gorzata Madej & Magdalena Jakubowicz, 2014. "Enterprise’S Investment In Its Staff – Efficiency And Profitability Of Internal Training," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 9(1), pages 146-158, June.
    2. André Torre & Frédéric Wallet (ed.), 2014. "Regional Development and Proximity Relations," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14813.
    3. Andy Pike & Andrés Rodriguez-Pose & John Tomaney, 2008. "Local and Regional Development," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 84(2), pages 241-242, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marek Furmankiewicz & Adrian Campbell, 2019. "From Single-Use Community Facilities Support to Integrated Sustainable Development: The Aims of Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Poland, 1990–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-21, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jarkko Saarinen, 2013. "Critical Sustainability: Setting the Limits to Growth and Responsibility in Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. V. E. Seliverstov, 2021. "Connectivity of the Siberian Space: Problems and Solutions," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 23-34, December.
    3. Maryline Filippi, 2014. "Using the Regional Advantage: French Agricultural Cooperatives' Economic and Governance Tool," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(4), pages 597-615, December.
    4. N. Yu. Zamyatina & A. N. Pilyasov, 2017. "Concept of proximity: Foreign experience and prospects of application in Russia," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 197-207, July.
    5. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Eduardo I. Palavicini-Corona, 2012. "Does local economic development really work? Assessing LED across Mexican municipalities," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1224, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Nov 2012.
    6. Betsy Donald & Mia Gray & Centre for Business Research, 2018. "The Double Crisis: In What Sense A Regional Problem?," Working Papers wp507, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    7. Andrea Ferloni, 2021. "Transitions as a coevolutionary process: the urban emergence of electric vehicle inventions," GEIST - Geography of Innovation and Sustainability Transitions 2021(10), GEIST Working Paper Series.
    8. Peter Nijkamp, 2021. "Borders as opportunities in the space-economy: towards a theory of enabling space," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 223-239, February.
    9. Will Bartlett, 2009. "Economic Development In The European Super-Periphery: Evidence From The Western Balkans," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 54(181), pages 21-44, April – J.
    10. Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2018. "Impact of Cultural “Ambiance†on the Spatial Distribution of Creative Professions," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 41(1), pages 103-128, January.
    11. Ana Maria Bonomi Barufi & Eduardo Amaral Haddad & Peter Nijkamp, 2016. "Industrial scope of agglomeration economies in Brazil," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 56(3), pages 707-755, May.
    12. Patrick Gianfaldoni & Lucile Manoury, 2018. "The Contribution Of Fondation De France To Territorialized And Territorializing Processes Of Social Innovation [La contribution de la Fondation de France aux processus territorialisés et territoria," Post-Print hal-02011090, HAL.
    13. Marina Van Geenhuizen & Pieter Stek, 2015. "Mapping innovation in the global photovoltaic industry: a bibliometric approach to cluster identification and analysis," ERSA conference papers ersa15p697, European Regional Science Association.
    14. Jona Gyorgy, 2015. "Determinants of Hungarian Sub-Regions’ Territorial Capital," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 22(1), pages 101-119, June.
    15. Vasilis Angelis & Katerina Dimaki, 2011. "A Region's Basic Image as a Measure of its Attractiveness," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), International Hellenic University (IHU), Kavala Campus, Greece (formerly Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of Technology - EMaTTech), vol. 4(2), pages 7-33, August.
    16. Juan Eduardo Chica & Carlos Marmolejo, 2016. "Knowledge economy and metropolitan growth: Barcelona and Helsinki metropolitan areas as case studies," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 22-42.
    17. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu, 2018. "Proximities and the Intensity of Scientific Relations," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 41(1), pages 7-44, January.
    18. Jonas Fernando Petry & Mohamed Amal & Dinorá Eliete Floriani, 2018. "Institutional Distance, Regional Clusters and Performance of Foreign Subsidiaries: Evidences from Brazil," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 15(3), pages 302-316, May.
    19. Giulio Cainelli & Sandro Montresor & Giuseppe Vittucci Marzetti, 2014. "Spatial agglomeration and firm exit: a spatial dynamic analysis for Italian provinces," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 213-228, June.
    20. Zademach, Hans-Martin & Musch, Annika-Kathrin, 2016. "Sharing is caring? Fahrradverleihsysteme im Kontext nachhaltiger Regionalentwicklung. Entwicklungen, Potenziale, Grenzen," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Jacoby, Christian & Wappelhorst, Sandra (ed.), Potenziale neuer Mobilitätsformen und -technologien für eine nachhaltige Raumentwicklung, volume 18, pages 175-204, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pcz:journl:v:13:y:2016:i:1:p:7-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paula Bajdor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzpczpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.