IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/risman/v23y2021i1d10.1057_s41283-021-00068-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk assessment of VAT invoice crime levels of companies based on DFPSVM: a case study in China

Author

Listed:
  • Ning Ding

    (People’s Public Security University of China)

  • Xinnan Zhang

    (People’s Public Security University of China)

  • Yiming Zhai

    (People’s Public Security University of China)

  • Chenglong Li

    (People’s Public Security University of China)

Abstract

In recent years, with the implementation of the policy of “Replacing Business Tax with Value-Added Tax” and “Streamlining Administration, Delegating Powers and Improving Regulation and Services” in China, criminals have been issuing false invoices, and such cases have shown a trend of high frequency in the category of economic crimes. Tax departments and public security departments are facing increasingly a serious crime situation that has created a new challenge. By studying the current trend of false invoice crime, the difficulties of investigation in such cases are analyzed. Using the tax information of enterprises that have conducted false invoice as the breakthrough point, the machine learning method is introduced to build a risk pre-warning assessment model based on the Support Vector Machine (SVM) method to detect enterprises issuing false invoices. Three steps were designed in this paper. First, a risk pre-warning assessment model was established to detect enterprises issuing false invoices. Second, enterprises were classified into three groups according to the risk levels: A, B, and C. Third, collected data were used to make an empirical analysis, and the results show that the accuracy rate of the model is 97%. In China, due to the high crime rate of tax fraud cases, it is important to obtain data from tax and public security departments to establish a model that can detect such crimes as early as possible. The police and tax authorities can use this model to jointly combat such crimes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ning Ding & Xinnan Zhang & Yiming Zhai & Chenglong Li, 2021. "Risk assessment of VAT invoice crime levels of companies based on DFPSVM: a case study in China," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 75-96, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:risman:v:23:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1057_s41283-021-00068-5
    DOI: 10.1057/s41283-021-00068-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41283-021-00068-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41283-021-00068-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rainer Hirk & Kurt Hornik & Laura Vana, 2019. "Multivariate ordinal regression models: an analysis of corporate credit ratings," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(3), pages 507-539, September.
    2. Laszlo Goerke, 2014. "Tax Evasion by Individuals," IAAEU Discussion Papers 201409, Institute of Labour Law and Industrial Relations in the European Union (IAAEU).
    3. Korndörfer, Martin & Krumpal, Ivar & Schmukle, Stefan C., 2014. "Measuring and explaining tax evasion: Improving self-reports using the crosswise model," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 18-32.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Milosavljević, Miloš & Radovanović, Sandro & Delibašić, Boris, 2023. "What drives the performance of tax administrations? Evidence from selected european countries," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goerke, Laszlo & Neugart, Michael, 2017. "Social comparisons in oligopsony," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 196-209.
    2. Burgstaller, Lilith & Feld, Lars P. & Pfeil, Katharina, 2022. "Working in the shadow: Survey techniques for measuring and explaining undeclared work," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 661-671.
    3. Yamen, Ahmed & Allam, Amir & Bani-Mustafa, Ahmed & Uyar, Ali, 2018. "Impact of institutional environment quality on tax evasion: A comparative investigation of old versus new EU members," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 17-29.
    4. Tianzhi Gao & Qian Lu & Yiping Zhang & Hui Feng, 2024. "Does Farmers’ Cognition Enhance Their Enthusiasm for Adopting Sustainable Digital Agricultural Extension Services? Evidence from Rural China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Jaspreet Kaur & Madhu Vij & Ajay Kumar Chauhan, 2023. "Signals influencing corporate credit ratings—a systematic literature review," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 50(1), pages 91-114, March.
    6. Reinoso-Carvalho, Felipe & Gunn, Laura & Molina, German & Narumi, Takuji & Spence, Charles & Suzuki, Yuji & ter Horst, Enrique & Wagemans, Johan, 2020. "A sprinkle of emotions vs a pinch of crossmodality: Towards globally meaningful sonic seasoning strategies for enhanced multisensory tasting experiences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 389-399.
    7. Nicoló Andrea Caserini & Paolo Pagnottoni, 2022. "Effective transfer entropy to measure information flows in credit markets," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 31(4), pages 729-757, October.
    8. Rubens Moura de Carvalho & Helena Coelho Inácio & Rui Pedro Marques, 2024. "An Empirical Analysis of Tax Evasion among Companies Engaged in Stablecoin Transactions," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Marc Höglinger & Ben Jann, 2018. "More is not always better: An experimental individual-level validation of the randomized response technique and the crosswise model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, August.
    10. Julia Meisters & Adrian Hoffmann & Jochen Musch, 2020. "Can detailed instructions and comprehension checks increase the validity of crosswise model estimates?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Richter, Sylvia & Heyde, Frank & Horsch, Andreas & Wünsche, Andreas, 2021. "Determinants of project bond prices – Insights into infrastructure and energy capital markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    12. Ibrahim Niankara & Riham Muqattash & Aminata Niankara & Rachidatou I. Traoret, 2020. "COVID-19 Vaccine Development in a Quadruple Helix Innovation System: Uncovering the Preferences of the Fourth Helix in the UAE," JOItmC, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-25, November.
    13. María del Mar García Rueda & Pier Francesco Perri & Beatriz Rodríguez Cobo, 2018. "Advances in estimation by the item sum technique using auxiliary information in complex surveys," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 102(3), pages 455-478, July.
    14. Walzenbach, Sandra & Hinz, Thomas, 2022. "Puzzling Answers to Crosswise Questions - Examining Overall Prevalence Rates, Primacy Effects and Learning Effects," EconStor Preprints 249353, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    15. Hirk, Rainer & Vana, Laura & Hornik, Kurt, 2022. "A corporate credit rating model with autoregressive errors," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 224-240.
    16. Ulrich Thy Jensen, 2020. "Is self-reported social distancing susceptible to social desirability bias? Using the crosswise model to elicit sensitive behaviors," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 3(2).
    17. Julia Meisters & Adrian Hoffmann & Jochen Musch, 2020. "Controlling social desirability bias: An experimental investigation of the extended crosswise model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Luca Zanin, 2022. "Estimating the effects of ESG scores on corporate credit ratings using multivariate ordinal logit regression," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 62(6), pages 3087-3118, June.
    19. Kirchner Antje, 2015. "Validating Sensitive Questions: A Comparison of Survey and Register Data," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 31(1), pages 31-59, March.
    20. Wang, Tong & Xu, Zheng & Kolady, Deepthi & Ulrich-Schad, Jessica D. & Clay, David, 2020. "Cover-Crop Usage in South Dakota: Farmer Perceived Profitability and Future Adoption Decisions," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 46(2), August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:risman:v:23:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1057_s41283-021-00068-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.