IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v9y2022i1d10.1057_s41599-022-01457-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Topical and emotional expressions regarding extreme weather disasters on social media: a comparison of posts from official media and the public

Author

Listed:
  • Ziqiang Han

    (Shandong University
    Tsinghua University)

  • Mengfan Shen

    (Shandong University)

  • Hongbing Liu

    (Shandong University)

  • Yifan Peng

    (University of Cornell)

Abstract

Understanding media frames and the public resonance during disasters is essential for making inclusive climate change and adaptation policies in the context of increasingly extreme weather events. In this study, we use the extreme weather and flood event that occurred in July 2021 in Zhengzhou, China, as a case study to investigate how official media in China reported this event and how the public responded. Moreover, since one accountability investigation report regarding this disaster was released in January 2022, we also compared these posts between the emergency response period and the post-crisis learning period after the report’s release. Topic modeling using the LDA (Latent Dirichlet Allocation) method and emotion analysis were conducted to analyze the posts from Weibo, China’s primary social media platform. The results demonstrated that the posts from official media and the public comments differed in both topics and emotions, with relatively little coherence. During the emergency response period, the media’s posts focused more on the facts, such as the extreme weather event, the places where it occurred, the impacts, and the search and rescue efforts, while the public comments were more about help appeals from the neglected ones in the rural areas, and emotional expressions such as moral support, condolence or encouragement to the victims and their families. After the accountability investigation in January, the media’s posts primarily covered the investigation process, the punishment, the attribution of disaster consequences, and the lessons learned, while the public’s comments were relatively emotional, praised the good, condoled the victims, and condemned the villains. The dominant emotion from the media’s posts was “like” in July 2021, but it became depression in January 2022. Anger was the prevalent emotion from the public during all the stages. This study provided valuable knowledge to the current understanding of the different patterns and dynamics of official media reports and the public’s resonance in disaster management.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziqiang Han & Mengfan Shen & Hongbing Liu & Yifan Peng, 2022. "Topical and emotional expressions regarding extreme weather disasters on social media: a comparison of posts from official media and the public," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:9:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-022-01457-1
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-022-01457-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-022-01457-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-022-01457-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip H. Brown & Jessica H. Minty, 2008. "Media Coverage and Charitable Giving after the 2004 Tsunami," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 75(1), pages 9-25, July.
    2. Babak Abedin & Abdul Babar, 2018. "Institutional vs. Non-institutional use of Social Media during Emergency Response: A Case of Twitter in 2014 Australian Bush Fire," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 729-740, August.
    3. Patricia P. Iglesias-Sánchez & Gustavo Fabián Vaccaro Witt & Francisco E. Cabrera & Carmen Jambrino-Maldonado, 2020. "The Contagion of Sentiments during the COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis: The Case of Isolation in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-10, August.
    4. Philip H. Brown & Jessica H. Minty, 2008. "Media Coverage and Charitable Giving after the 2004 Tsunami," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 75(1), pages 9-25, July.
    5. Elizabeth A. Albright, 2020. "Disaster-driven discussion," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 12-13, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu, Yongan & Duong, Duy & Xu, Hualong, 2023. "Attention! Predicting crude oil prices from the perspective of extreme weather," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nguyen, Cathy & Faulkner, Margaret & Yang, Song & Williams, John & Tong, Luqiong, 2022. "Mind the gap: Understanding the gap between intentions and behaviour in the charity context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 216-224.
    2. Méon, Pierre-Guillaume & Verwimp, Philip, 2022. "Pro-social behavior after a disaster: Evidence from a storm hitting an open-air festival," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 493-510.
    3. Aldashev, Gani & Marini, Marco & Verdier, Thierry, 2014. "Brothers in alms? Coordination between nonprofits on markets for donations," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 182-200.
    4. Fatuma Namisango & Kyeong Kang & Ghassan Beydoun, 2022. "How the Structures Provided by Social Media Enable Collaborative Outcomes: A Study of Service Co-creation in Nonprofits," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 517-535, April.
    5. Ross Hickey & Bradley Minaker & A. Abigail Payne, 2019. "The Sensitivity of Charitable Giving to the Timing and Salience of Tax Credits," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 72(1), pages 79-110, March.
    6. Ghassan Beydoun & Sergiu Dascalu & Dale Dominey-Howes & Andrew Sheehan, 2018. "Disaster Management and Information Systems: Insights to Emerging Challenges," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 649-652, August.
    7. Brown, Sarah & Harris, Mark N. & Taylor, Karl, 2012. "Modelling charitable donations to an unexpected natural disaster: Evidence from the U.S. Panel Study of Income Dynamics," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 97-110.
    8. Henry Hyun-Do Kim & Kwangwoo Park, 2021. "Impact of Environmental Disaster Movies on Corporate Environmental and Financial Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-35, January.
    9. Pierre-Guillaume Méon & Philip Verwimp, 2016. "Pro-social behavior after a disaster: parochial or universal? Evidence from a natural experiment in Belgium," Working Papers CEB 16-054, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    10. Emily Heaney & Laura Hunter & Angus Clulow & Devin Bowles & Sotiris Vardoulakis, 2021. "Efficacy of Communication Techniques and Health Outcomes of Bushfire Smoke Exposure: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-14, October.
    11. Sarah Smith & Mark Ottoni-Wilhelm & Kimberley Scharf, 2017. "The Donation Response to Natural Disasters," Bristol Economics Discussion Papers 17/688, School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
    12. Naim Kapucu & Ratna Okhai & Yue Ge & Chris Zobel, 2023. "The use of documentary data for network analysis in emergency and crisis management," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(1), pages 425-445, March.
    13. Andrea Castro-Martinez & Paula Méndez-Domínguez & Aimiris Sosa Valcarcel & Joaquín Castillo de Mesa, 2021. "Social Connectivity, Sentiment and Participation on Twitter during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Claude Berrebi & Ariel Karlinsky & Hanan Yonah, 2021. "Individual and community behavioral responses to natural disasters," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(2), pages 1541-1569, January.
    15. Carine Dominguez-Péry & Rana Tassabehji & Lakshmi Narasimha Raju Vuddaraju & Vikhram Kofi Duffour, 2021. "Improving emergency response operations in maritime accidents using social media with big data analytics: a case study of the MV Wakashio disaster," Post-Print hal-04021179, HAL.
    16. Franco Arolfo & Kevin Cortés Rodriguez & Alejandro Vaisman, 2022. "Analyzing the Quality of Twitter Data Streams," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 349-369, February.
    17. Ilya O. Ryzhov & Bin Han & Jelena Bradić, 2016. "Cultivating Disaster Donors Using Data Analytics," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(3), pages 849-866, March.
    18. Wei Chen & Yijun Shi & Liwen Fan & Lijun Huang & Jingyi Gao, 2021. "Influencing Factors of Public Satisfaction with COVID-19 Prevention Services Based on Structural Equation Modeling (SEM): A Study of Nanjing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Baris Yoruk, 2013. "Are Generous People More Likely to Vote?," Discussion Papers 13-10, University at Albany, SUNY, Department of Economics.
    20. Wen Shi & Diyi Liu & Jing Yang & Jing Zhang & Sanmei Wen & Jing Su, 2020. "Social Bots’ Sentiment Engagement in Health Emergencies: A Topic-Based Analysis of the COVID-19 Pandemic Discussions on Twitter," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-18, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:9:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-022-01457-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.