IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v2y2016i1d10.1057_palcomms.2016.5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Students being and becoming scientists: measured success in a novel science education partnership

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Yang

    (Clinical and Translational Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA)

  • Thomas J LaBounty

    (LaBounty Consulting, LLC, Woodbury, MN, USA)

  • Stephen C Ekker

    (Clinical and Translational Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
    Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA)

  • Chris Pierret

    (Clinical and Translational Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
    Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA)

Abstract

The primary and secondary learning years shape development of scientific interest and skills required for science literacy, presenting a critical timeline target for science education intervention. Although many initiatives exist to target this timeframe, the modern classroom belies easy scientific investigation. Numerous initiatives often run simultaneously in a given classroom, creating limited capacity for variable control. Consequently, there is a dearth of high-quality and meaningful data in education sciences that exacerbates the general segregation of education research from practice. Many science reform programmes go unmeasured. The limited number that is researched often report strictly qualitative results or stop short of statistically significant quantitative investigation. Lack of high-resolution data restricts the ability to make informed policy changes and precludes attainment of “evidence-based education”. Here, we demonstrate 5-year efficacy of a novel, inquiry-based primary and secondary science reform programme Integrated Science Education Outreach (InSciEd Out). Five years of data over three cohorts of matched students from US grades 5–8 show maintained gains in science fair and honours biology election, as well as improved performance on Minnesota state standardized science testing. Detailed value-added analyses further reveal InSciEd Out-correlated gains in partnership-focused areas of life sciences and history and nature of science. These analyses provide evidence that scientifically rigorous evaluation demonstrating relevant programme efficacy is indeed achievable in education science. Our results support the premise that the InSciEd Out programme is a scalable intervention capable of primary and secondary science education reform. The programme substantively builds upon prior efforts in the field. Although InSciEd Out deploys novel approaches and tools, the broad lessons learned from this programme are readily translatable to other contemporary efforts cultivating science literacy for all.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Yang & Thomas J LaBounty & Stephen C Ekker & Chris Pierret, 2016. "Students being and becoming scientists: measured success in a novel science education partnership," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 2(1), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:2:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1057_palcomms.2016.5
    DOI: 10.1057/palcomms.2016.5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palcomms.2016.5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palcomms.2016.5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joanna Yang Yowler & Kit Knier & Zachary WareJoncas & Shawna L. Ehlers & Stephen C. Ekker & Fabiola Guasp Reyes & Bruce F. Horazdovsky & Glenda Mueller & Adriana Morales Gomez & Amit Sood & Caroline R, 2021. "Rapid Adaptation and Remote Delivery of Undergraduate Research Training during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-10, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:2:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1057_palcomms.2016.5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.