Author
Listed:
- Ming Li
(Research Center for Rural Land Resources Utilization and Conservation, Jiangxi Agricultural University)
- Ni Zhan
(Research Center for Rural Land Resources Utilization and Conservation, Jiangxi Agricultural University)
- Ting Zhang
(Research Center for Rural Land Resources Utilization and Conservation, Jiangxi Agricultural University)
- Meiqiu Chen
(Research Center for Rural Land Resources Utilization and Conservation, Jiangxi Agricultural University)
Abstract
A complete understanding of homestead policy is crucial for farmers and is key to China’s rural homestead system reform. However, intergenerational cognitive differences have hindered reform progress as the changes to the system are complex. Based on Distributed Cognition Theory, this study established a theoretical framework to explain the formation of farmers’ homestead policy cognition and constructed an indicator system addressing personal power, regional power, and cultural power dimensions. Based on 2445 questionnaires across 345 villages in 37 counties of Jiangxi province, China, this study employed an OLS regression model to analyze factors influencing intergenerational differences in farmers’ homestead policy cognition and the ISM model to explore the mechanisms and driving forces. First, homestead policy cognition of older generation farmers (OFs) was significantly lower than that of new generation farmers (NFs). Second, personal, regional, and cultural power exerted more significant influence on the homestead policy cognition of OFs, when compared to NFs. OFs who reported higher education, participation in the formulation of village rules and regulations, and acquisition of homestead by application exhibited higher homestead policy cognition. Finally, regional power was found to be the root factor contributing to the formation of homestead policy cognition between the two generations studied. The policy cognition formation mechanism of OFs was found to be “regional power - personal power - cultural power - policy cognition.” Conversely, the policy cognition formation mechanism of NFs was found to be “regional power - cultural power - policy cognition.” These results suggest that government agencies should respect intergenerational cognitive differences, improve the policy publicity system, and adopt targeted measures to address the specific cognitive characteristics of different generations. This study explored the intergenerational differences in farmers’ homestead policy cognition, as well as the mechanisms for their formation, offering insights for rural land system reforms in other countries.
Suggested Citation
Ming Li & Ni Zhan & Ting Zhang & Meiqiu Chen, 2025.
"Intergenerational differences in the homestead policy cognition of farmers within the context of institutional change: empirical evidence from villages in Jiangxi province, China,"
Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04861-5
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04861-5
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04861-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.