IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-04817-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross the borders: the dual cultural devaluation of the Belt and Road co-production films

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Zhou

    (Wuhan University)

Abstract

Since the inception of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) by the Chinese government in 2013, there has been a concerted effort to promote cross-border and cross-cultural communication, with a particular emphasis on the field of Chinese cinema. This article embarks on a comprehensive evaluation of the extent to which co-produced films under the aegis of the BRI have effectively achieved the political and cultural objectives originally outlined by the policy. Moreover, it strives to offer an understanding of the reception and impact of these films in overseas markets. Employing computational textual analysis and visualisation techniques, the study examines the global market performance, online ratings, and critical reviews of BRI co-productions since their inception. Despite a decade of promotion, BRI co-productions have demonstrated limited success on the global stage. A key characteristic that has emerged is cultural discount, which is influenced by political factors, the diminishing artistic aura, and an absence of narrative strategies that emphasise translocality. BRI co-productions encounter dual cultural devaluation, stemming from conflicts between their cultural and political aspirations and the prevailing principles of the global film industry. The study proposes enhancing the quality of co-productions and generating promotional “buzz” as viable strategies to mitigate the loss of artistic prestige and to expand their global reach.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Zhou, 2025. "Cross the borders: the dual cultural devaluation of the Belt and Road co-production films," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04817-9
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04817-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04817-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-04817-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04817-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.