IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-04784-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing discursive reproductions of national military image between China and the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Luojia Wang

    (Shanghai International Studies University)

Abstract

National image building, a crucial element of Chinese soft power, has attracted growing scholarly attention. This study explores the discursive construction of one aspect of China’s national image—that of its military—and compares China’s self-projected images with those perceived by the United States. By employing a triangulated approach that integrates critical discourse analysis (CDA), a discourse-historical approach (DHA), three-dimensional typology, and corpus linguistics (CL), this paper examines the self-presentation and othering strategies employed by China and contrasts them with those used by the U.S. The findings highlight several key points: (1) While China presents a positive self-image, it often does so in a subtle and implicit manner; (2) Although negative depictions of other are commonly employed to construct a favourable self, China also elevates others as a superior group to be referenced, in an effort to legitimise its military actions; and (3) many military images promoted by China are countered by the U.S. The analysis identifies ideological systems, communicative purposes, and social psychology as key factors influencing the adoption of these discursive strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Luojia Wang, 2025. "Comparing discursive reproductions of national military image between China and the United States," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04784-1
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04784-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04784-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-04784-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04784-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.