IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-04641-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diachronic image construction in the documentary Seven Up: a multimodal critical discourse analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Danyang Wang

    (Jilin University)

  • Yunhua Xiang

    (Jilin University)

Abstract

Based on the Visual Grammar (VG) of Kress and van Leeuwen, the sound analysis of Machin, the context model of Wodak and Meyer, multimodal frameworks of Zhang and Bateman et al., this paper proposes a method for Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis (MCDA) to study the diachronic construction of the interviewees’ images in the BBC documentary series Seven Up. Conducting a qualitative method supplemented with a quantitative one, this study finds that the interviewees’ images are constructed diachronically mainly through the changes in representative meaning, interactive meaning, and compositional meaning of the visual pictures. Besides, there is a complementary relation, either reinforcing or non-reinforcing, among the visual mode, the verbal mode, and the audial mode. Each interviewee ends up projecting a totally different image compared with their initial portrayal. This study also discusses how certain modes contribute to revealing the changes in the ideology of BBC and the changing socio-political reality of UK.

Suggested Citation

  • Danyang Wang & Yunhua Xiang, 2025. "Diachronic image construction in the documentary Seven Up: a multimodal critical discourse analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04641-1
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04641-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04641-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-04641-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04641-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.