IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-04621-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power and marginalization in discourse on AI in education (AIEd): social actors’ representation in China Daily (2018–2023)

Author

Listed:
  • Xi Huang

    (National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA))

  • Savitri Gadavanij

    (National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA))

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd) has the potential to transform educational practice, and its media representation both reflects and reshapes public perceptions of this new technology. While interest in AIEd is growing worldwide, not all social actors are represented equally. Moreover, limited media coverage contributes to a scarcity of studies on AIEd media representations. This study examines how social actors are represented in AIEd discourses in China Daily (2018–2023), using 100 news articles selected through stratified proportional sampling in Nexis Uni to ensure balanced coverage across all years. Employing intertextuality analysis and social actor theory, the results show that government and corporate voices dominate, while public perspectives are marginalized. Discursive strategies, including objectivation, functionalization, and activation, construct a hierarchical collaboration, where government actors are activated to emphasize leadership, and corporate actors are functionalized as enabler to state-defined goals. Intertextuality analysis highlights co-occurrence between corporate and parental discourses, which risks prioritizing commercial interests over educational equity. This alignment weakened after 2021, reflecting a shift in government efforts to regulate educational commercialization. These findings show a hierarchical power dynamic in AIEd discourses, where government actors dominate and corporate actors subordinate, while public voices are marginalized. This framing prioritizes the institutional corporate and state interests, and limits inclusivity and diversity. This study advances the understanding of AIEd media discourses in a context distinct from Western-centric perspectives. By unpacking the imbalanced representations of social actors, this study uncovers the underlying power dynamics and ideologies in AIEd discourse. It encourages policymakers, educators, and media professionals to address equity and inclusion in media representations.

Suggested Citation

  • Xi Huang & Savitri Gadavanij, 2025. "Power and marginalization in discourse on AI in education (AIEd): social actors’ representation in China Daily (2018–2023)," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04621-5
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04621-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04621-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-04621-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04621-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.