IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-04545-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors influencing COVID-19 vaccination: a study performed in fall of 2021 among Romanian adults from general practitioners

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Florina Roșian

    (Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy
    Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy)

  • Simona Mirel

    (Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy)

  • Mira Florea

    (Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy)

  • Romana Vulturar

    (Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy)

  • Ovidiu Stan

    (Technical University of Cluj-Napoca)

  • Milena Man

    (Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy)

  • Lucia Maria Lotrean

    (Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy
    Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy)

Abstract

This study was performed during the fourth wave of COVID-19 cases in Romania and had three objectives. First, it has assessed the opinions regarding COVID-19 vaccination during a severe wave of the pandemic among Romanian adults. Second, it aimed to get insights into their behavior regarding vaccination and factors influencing it. Last, but not least, intention regarding future vaccination and associated factors were assessed. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 3 general practitioners’ (GP) medical offices, in one city from Cluj county, Romania, from October 2021 to December 2021. The study involved 502 Romanian adults who filled in an anonymous questionnaire. 71.7% of the participants were vaccinated and most of those patients were vaccinated with a vaccine that was given in several doses and received the second dose-45% or even the third one-33.1%. The results of the logistic regression analyses show that there were no age, gender or educational level differences regarding vaccination status. On the other hand, people who got the disease (OR = 0.533, CI = 0.315–0.903) or thought the vaccine provoked sterility for women (OR = 0.635, CI = 0.453–0.888) were less likely to get vaccinated. People who were more convinced about the efficacy and safety of the vaccine (OR = 1.718, CI = 1.338–2.206) as well as its importance for getting back to normality (OR = 2.151, CI = 1.705–2.713) were more likely to get vaccinated. A percentage of 42.3% of those who were not vaccinated said they do not know if they would get vaccinated, 33.1% of them said they would not get vaccinated, while around one quarter declared their intention to get vaccinated in the near future. The results of the logistic regression analyses show that there were no differences regarding the intention to get vaccinated based on age, gender or educational level, but people who had stronger beliefs that the vaccine is not protecting against the disease so is not useful were less convinced that they will get vaccinated (OR = 0.600, CI = 0.402–0.894), while those who believe it will help our return to normality were more likely to declare their intention to get vaccination (OR = 2.355, CI = 1.544–3.592). The study gives insights into attitudes, behavior and intention related to COVID-19 vaccination among Romanian adults during a challenging period of COVID-19 pandemic. The results have implications for public health, organization of health communication campaigns and pandemics management.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Florina Roșian & Simona Mirel & Mira Florea & Romana Vulturar & Ovidiu Stan & Milena Man & Lucia Maria Lotrean, 2025. "Factors influencing COVID-19 vaccination: a study performed in fall of 2021 among Romanian adults from general practitioners," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04545-0
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04545-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04545-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-04545-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04545-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.