IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-04526-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Producer organizations in the last 25 years: a bibliometric analysis and meta-review of the literature

Author

Listed:
  • Shantanu Bhunia

    (Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur)

  • Piyush Kumar Singh

    (Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur)

Abstract

Over the past few decades, producer organizations (POs) have garnered significant attention and policy support due to their potential for wealth creation and sustainable rural livelihoods. Research in this area typically focuses on the rural context, highlighting the services POs offer, their roles in market linkage activities, and their contribution to financial inclusion and rural growth. However, there is currently no comprehensive review of the literature that explores the organizational attributes of various collective forms and their role in sustainable development goals. We, therefore, conduct a meta-analysis of the literature based on bibliometrics to understand current research trends and identify existing gaps. We used Scopus as the bibliometric data source and focused on PO-related developments during 1998–2023 for our analysis. A total of 74 papers were found eligible for this meta-review. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were applied to extract papers based on inclusion criteria. Bibliometric analysis was performed using the VOSviewer tool. We discussed the findings based on the clusters generated in the co-citation study. Indeed, this research summarizes major structural reforms, market linkages by the POs, and the impact of membership on rural livelihood. A range of organizational attributes, including ownership, control, benefit, profit share, governance, autonomy, marketing, and liability factors of cooperatives and producer companies, have been analyzed and compared. We found that producer companies carry both the goodness of co-operative structure, i.e. credit access, training, bargaining ability, and other technical facilities and the vibrancy and efficacy of private companies. The role of POs in contract farming and value chain integration is extensively discussed in the selected literature. Using Cohen’s d, we further demonstrate that membership in a PO significantly enhances farmers’ bargaining power, market access, and credit acquisition compared to non-members. Based on our analysis, we conclude that POs have the potential to play a pivotal role in achieving the sustainable development goals (SDGs) by 2030, which are critical for the development of emerging economies. However, this is the first attempt to investigate POs in such a holistic way using bibliometrics, to the best of the authors’ knowledge. These findings could be meaningful in shaping regional policy and expediting future investments to establish robust business ventures.

Suggested Citation

  • Shantanu Bhunia & Piyush Kumar Singh, 2025. "Producer organizations in the last 25 years: a bibliometric analysis and meta-review of the literature," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04526-3
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04526-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04526-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-04526-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04526-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.