IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-04497-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Re-evaluating the labor market effects of occupational licensing: Longitudinal evidence across states

Author

Listed:
  • Christos A. Makridis

    (Arizona State University
    Institute for the Future, University of Nicosia)

  • Patrick A. McLaughlin

    (The Hoover Institution at Stanford University)

Abstract

We present new data on regulatory restrictions across states and occupations between 2017 and 2022 to study the labor market effects of occupational licensing. First, we document three stylized facts: (a) regulatory restrictions across states and occupations have grown by nearly a factor of three since 2019, (b) increases in regulatory restrictions are concentrated in occupations with lower median hourly wages and higher within-occupation inequality, and (c) states that expanded regulatory restrictions tend to have lower GOP vote shares. Second, exploiting variation across occupations within the same state-year, we find that a 10% rise in regulatory restrictions leads to a 2% rise in hourly wages, but a 4% decline in employment. Both the employment and wage effects are concentrated in lower wage jobs, as well as among respondents with professional licenses, even after controlling for differences across industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Christos A. Makridis & Patrick A. McLaughlin, 2025. "Re-evaluating the labor market effects of occupational licensing: Longitudinal evidence across states," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04497-5
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04497-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04497-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-04497-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04497-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.