IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-024-04349-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Renovating Confucian ideas for gender equality: an inquiry of Confucian feminist debates in modern China

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Li

    (Huazhong University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

Contrary to the common perception that Confucianism is incompatible with feminist movement, this article demonstrates that Chinese intellectuals in the 1890s–1920s positively reconstructed and applied Confucian ideas that provide a theoretical and political path to gender equality. Deploying the immanent critique method and grounded theory method to analyze the texts and practices of the intellectuals, the study identified three anchoring elements of the Confucian feminism: 1. benevolent reciprocal and hierarchical relations that extend humanity to all and embrace contribution by all (expansive ren 仁); 2. critical (jian) dao, the way or path of applying ren, yi (义) and shu (恕) to the treatment of women (especially the less advantaged among them); 3. enabling and encouraging women’s cultivation for self-progression and contribution to a healthy society (xiuji da datong 修己达大同). Different from feminist political liberalism, Confucian feminism during the 1890s–1920s of China promoted the positive (e.g., benevolent and affective) features of reciprocal and hierarchical relations that enable women’s self-progression and societal contribution. It has potential to encourage transnational and global feminist politics that advance decolonial solutions from local social and cultural (particularly Asian) contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Li, 2025. "Renovating Confucian ideas for gender equality: an inquiry of Confucian feminist debates in modern China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-04349-8
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-04349-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-04349-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-04349-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jenco, Leigh Kathryn, 2007. "“What Does Heaven Ever Say?” A Methods-centered Approach to Cross-cultural Engagement," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 101(4), pages 741-755, November.
    2. Kim, Sungmoon, 2015. "Public Reason Confucianism: A Construction," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 109(1), pages 187-200, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jian Yang & Chaohua Dong & Yongjin Chen, 2021. "Government’s Economic Performance Fosters Trust in Government in China: Assessing the Moderating Effect of Respect for Authority," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 545-558, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-04349-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.