Author
Listed:
- Kai-di Liu
(Shandong University
Shandong University
Shandong University)
- Minghui Jin
(Shandong University
Shandong University
Shandong University)
- Liang Cheng
(Shandong University
Shandong University)
Abstract
Gross ecosystem product (GEP) refers to the direct measurement of a region’s ecosystem product supply capabilities and the basis for value realisation. China has made clear arrangements for establishing GEP assessment regulations, with 36 districts and counties currently conducting GEP assessment, of which 24 districts and counties have executed dual assessments of regional gross domestic product (GDP) and GEP. To explore the influence of GEP assessment on the common prosperity of urban and rural regions, this study conducts a quasi-natural experiment using the staggered difference-in-differences model to examine data from 1946 districts and counties from 2012 to 2022. The results reveal that GEP assessment can significantly reduce the urban-rural income gap and improve rural residents’ income, thereby realising common prosperity. Further analysis indicates that GEP assessment promotes faster income growth for rural residents and a narrowing of the income gap between urban and rural residents through enhanced government attention, fiscal support, green finance, and agricultural development. The impact of GEP assessment on common prosperity is obviously heterogeneous. The ability of GEP assessment to promote common prosperity is stronger in key ecological function areas, districts and counties with strong fiscal capacity and high public environmental concern. This study confirms the positive role of GEP assessment in increasing rural residents’ income and advancing common prosperity. The results also provide a decision-making reference for the expedient implementation of GEP assessment.
Suggested Citation
Kai-di Liu & Minghui Jin & Liang Cheng, 2025.
"County green transformation: how does gross ecosystem product assessment promote common prosperity?,"
Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-04330-5
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-04330-5
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-04330-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.