IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-024-04314-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-serving regret: experimental evidence from a reciprocity game

Author

Listed:
  • Zeng Lian

    (Beijing Foreign Studies University)

  • Xin Shen

    (Beijing Foreign Studies University)

  • Jie Zheng

    (Shandong University)

Abstract

Self-serving bias is a pervasive tendency in human behavior. Our study aimed to explore its manifestations in belief formation and the resulting behavior by using a three-stage reciprocity game that incorporated belief elicitation and regret option (N = 256). Specifically, we examined the post-decision regret of the recipients (reciprocators). The asymmetry between upward and downward adjustments by the reciprocators indicates a self-serving pattern: Reciprocators who underestimated the allocated amount are less likely to make an upward adjustment compared to the likelihood of a downward adjustment made by those who overestimated the allocated amount. This behavioral pattern is robust in both estimation and allocation biases, and across both extensive and intensive margins. Additionally, we investigated whether individuals form self-serving beliefs to justify their selfish actions but find no statistical evidence supporting this notion. Together, these findings contribute to the literature on self-serving bias by providing a lens to view beliefs and regret better.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeng Lian & Xin Shen & Jie Zheng, 2025. "Self-serving regret: experimental evidence from a reciprocity game," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-04314-5
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-04314-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-04314-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-04314-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-04314-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.