Author
Listed:
- Jose M. Rodríguez-Pellejero
(University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria)
- Itahisa Mulero-Henríquez
(University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria)
- Zaira Santana Amador
(University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria)
Abstract
Most child-friendly court reforms are based on the assumption that the court setting is a stressful experience. Our objective was to analyze the acute stress levels of children who come to testify in a child-friendly investigative court using a person-by-environment approach. We employed a simple repeated measures design for this study, which included 42 minors of Spanish nationality who provided testimony as victims of violence in Spain’s inaugural Child-Friendly Court. Among the participants, 73.8% were girls with a mean age of 12.5 years (SD = 3.4), and 26.2% were boys with a mean age of 11.4 years (SD = 3.1). Stress levels were measured using heart rate variability, and anxiety was assessed using state-trait questionnaires. The study found that the mean percentile of anxiety remained at moderate levels, while stress remained at medium-low levels. No significant differences in anxiety or stress were found based on gender or type of crime. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant differences in stress levels among different court settings. Stress levels in the waiting room and Gesell room were significantly higher than those in the decompression room. In conclusion, the experience of testifying in a Gesell room about the aggressions suffered increases stress levels. However, in this sample and for this Pilot Court, the stress levels observed during testimony did not reach levels considered detrimental to children’s health. Our results lend support to the new European Judicial Policy, which includes the establishment and operation of Specialized Courts adapted to the needs of children and adolescents.
Suggested Citation
Jose M. Rodríguez-Pellejero & Itahisa Mulero-Henríquez & Zaira Santana Amador, 2024.
"Real-time stress monitoring in a child-friendly court: a repeated measures field study,"
Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03410-w
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-03410-w
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03410-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.