IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v11y2024i1d10.1057_s41599-024-03252-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Induced abortion among adolescent girls and young women: should geography matter in Ghana?

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua Okyere

    (Challenging Height Ghana
    Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology)

  • Frank Kyei-Arthur

    (University of Environment and Sustainable Development)

  • Martin Wiredu Agyekum

    (University of Education)

  • Pascal Agbadi

    (Lingnan University)

  • Isaac Yeboah

    (University of Professional Studies)

Abstract

Globally, there has been a slight reduction in abortion rates. However, abortion rates have increased in other major regions, including sub-Saharan Africa. Induced abortion rates vary by ecological zone and place of residence, and it is prevalent among women aged 15–24. This study examined the predictors of induced abortion in ecological zones by place of residence among adolescent girls and young women aged 15–24. The 2017 Ghana Maternal and Health Survey, which is a nationally representative household survey dataset, was used for this study. This analysis is restricted to 3194 Adolescent Girls and Young Women (AGYW) aged 15–24 years. A two-level multilevel binary logistic regression model was used to analyze the individual and contextual level characteristics associated with induced abortion. The results show that the prevalence rate of induced abortion among adolescent girls and young women is 26.0%. After adjusting for individual and community level factors, ecological zones and place of residence predicted induced abortion among AGYW. More importantly, the results demonstrate that AGYW residing in urban areas of the forest zones were statistically significant to report induced abortion compared to those in the rural areas. In conclusion, there is a strong association between place of residence, ecological zones and induced abortion in Ghana. Primarily, urban-dwelling women in the forest zone are more likely to report induced abortion. There is, therefore, a need to prioritize women residing in urban areas and the forest zone of Ghana. AGYW in these high-risk ecological zones should be reached with sufficient health education and sensitization about induced abortion. Given the protective factor of contraceptive use, it is recommended that the government and its health agencies strengthen campaigns to improve contraceptive use among AGYW across the country, particularly in the urban forest ecological zone.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua Okyere & Frank Kyei-Arthur & Martin Wiredu Agyekum & Pascal Agbadi & Isaac Yeboah, 2024. "Induced abortion among adolescent girls and young women: should geography matter in Ghana?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03252-6
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-03252-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-03252-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-03252-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sophia Chae & Sheila Desai & Marjorie Crowell & Gilda Sedgh & Susheela Singh, 2017. "Characteristics of women obtaining induced abortions in selected low- and middle-income countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl, 2008. "The Congressional Debate on Partial-Birth Abortion: Constitutional Gravitas and Moral Passion," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(3), pages 383-410, July.
    3. Shallon Atuhaire, 2019. "Abortion among adolescents in Africa: A review of practices, consequences, and control strategies," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 1378-1386, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shallon Atuhaire, 2019. "Abortion among adolescents in Africa: A review of practices, consequences, and control strategies," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 1378-1386, October.
    2. Jamaica Corker & Clémentine Rossier & Lonkila Moussa Zan, 2022. "Fertility among better-off women in sub-Saharan Africa: Nearing late transition levels across the region," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 46(29), pages 849-864.
    3. Dane G. Wendell & Raymond Tatalovich, 2021. "Classifying public policies with Moral Foundations Theory," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(1), pages 155-182, March.
    4. David Bholat & Stephen Hans & Pedro Santos & Cheryl Schonhardt-Bailey, 2015. "Text mining for central banks," Handbooks, Centre for Central Banking Studies, Bank of England, number 33, April.
    5. Abdul-Aziz Seidu & Bright Opoku Ahinkorah & Edward Kwabena Ameyaw & Amu Hubert & Wonder Agbemavi & Ebenezer Kwesi Armah-Ansah & Eugene Budu & Francis Sambah & Vivian Tackie, 2020. "What has women’s reproductive health decision-making capacity and other factors got to do with pregnancy termination in sub-Saharan Africa? evidence from 27 cross-sectional surveys," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Yui Koiwa & Eri Shishido & Shigeko Horiuchi, 2024. "Factors Influencing Abortion Decision-Making of Adolescents and Young Women: A Narrative Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(3), pages 1-24, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03252-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.