IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v10y2023i1d10.1057_s41599-023-01967-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The REFUGE-ED Dialogic Co-Creation Process: working with and for REFUGE-ED children and minors

Author

Listed:
  • Teresa Sordé-Martí

    (Autonomous University of Barcelona, Edifici B Campus UAB - Carrer de Fortuna s/n - Facultat de Polítiques i Sociologia)

  • Adnan Abdul Ghani

    (Save the Children, Lilla Bommen 4b)

  • Bilal Almobarak

    (Support Group Network)

  • Tiziana Chiappelli

    (Università degli Studi di Firenze (University of Florence))

  • Ainhoa Flecha

    (Autonomous University of Barcelona, Edifici B Campus UAB - Carrer de Fortuna s/n - Facultat de Polítiques i Sociologia)

  • Mina Hristova

    (Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Studies with Ethnographic Museum at the Bulgarian Academy of Science)

  • Anna Krasteva

    (New Bulgarian University)

  • Fredrika Kjellberg

    (Save the Children, Lilla Bommen 4b)

  • Katie McQuillan

    (Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin)

  • Elizabeth Nixon

    (New Bulgarian University)

  • Misbah Qasemi

    (Support Group Network)

  • Olga Serradell

    (Autonomous University of Barcelona, Edifici B Campus UAB - Carrer de Fortuna s/n - Facultat de Polítiques i Sociologia)

  • Emilia Aiello

    (Autonomous University of Barcelona, Edifici B Campus UAB - Carrer de Fortuna s/n - Facultat de Polítiques i Sociologia)

  • Lorraine Swords

    (Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin)

  • Hend Talal Abdulrahman

    (Save the Children, Lilla Bommen 4b)

Abstract

A growing body of literature suggests that involving end-users in intervention research, including design, implementation, and evaluation, is associated with numerous positive outcomes. These outcomes include improved intervention efficacy, sustainability, and psychological growth among collaborators. The value of this approach and the recommendation for researchers to embrace co-creation in implementation and policies have also been recognised within the EU Framework of Research Innovation. Furthermore, it has been suggested that this approach may be particularly relevant for working with individuals from marginalised groups, whose voices are often absent from research and policy discussions. However, there has been limited attention given to how co-creation unfolds in practice. In this article, we provide a review of the methodological framework implemented by the H2020 REFUGE-ED (2021–2023), which was conducted in collaboration with migrant, refugee, and asylum-seeking communities. The project implemented the 'REFUGE-ED Dialogic Co-Creation Process (RDCP)' in 46 educational settings across six European countries. Considering the need for evidence-based approaches in education and mental health and psychosocial support practices, we suggest that the RDCP has the potential for sustainability and replicability in diverse contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Teresa Sordé-Martí & Adnan Abdul Ghani & Bilal Almobarak & Tiziana Chiappelli & Ainhoa Flecha & Mina Hristova & Anna Krasteva & Fredrika Kjellberg & Katie McQuillan & Elizabeth Nixon & Misbah Qasemi &, 2023. "The REFUGE-ED Dialogic Co-Creation Process: working with and for REFUGE-ED children and minors," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-01967-6
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-01967-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-023-01967-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-023-01967-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramon Flecha & Marta Soler-Gallart & Teresa Sordé, 2015. "Europe must fund social sciences," Nature, Nature, vol. 528(7581), pages 193-193, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonia Moreno Cano & Rafael Romón Sagredo & Rocío García-Carrión & Begonya Garcia-Zapirain, 2020. "Social Impact Assessment of HealthyAIR Tool for Real-Time Detection of Pollution Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Lidia Puigvert & Marta Soler-Gallart & Ana Vidu, 2022. "From Bystanders to Upstanders: Supporters and Key Informants for Victims of Gender Violence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Emilia Aiello & Ainhoa Flecha & Olga Serradell, 2018. "Exploring the Barriers: A Qualitative Study about the Experiences of Mid-SES Roma Navigating the Spanish Healthcare System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Guiomar Merodio & Mimar Ramis-Salas & Diana Valero & Adriana Aubert, 2020. "How Much Is One Life Worth? The Right to Equity Healthcare for Improving Older Patients’ Health Infected by COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Andrea Mervar & Maja Jokić, 2022. "Core-periphery nexus in the EU social sciences: bibliometric perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(10), pages 5793-5817, October.
    6. Ferreira, Paula & Rocha, Ana & Araujo, Madalena & Afonso, Joao L. & Antunes, Carlos Henggeler & Lopes, Marta A.R. & Osório, Gerardo J. & Catalão, João P.S. & Lopes, João Peças, 2023. "Assessing the societal impact of smart grids: Outcomes of a collaborative research project," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    7. Jovana Janinovic & Sanja Pekovic & Dijana Vuckovic & Stevo Popovic & Rajka Djokovic & Mirjana Pejiæ Bach, 2020. "Innovative strategies for creating and assessing research quality and societal impact in social sciences and humanities," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 18(4), pages 449-458.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-01967-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.