IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/marecl/v10y2008i1p75-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Container Port Accessibility: An Application of the Principal Eigenvector Method (PEM)

Author

Listed:
  • Yuhong Wang

    (School of Marine Science and Technology, Armstrong Building, University of Newcastle, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.)

  • Kevin Cullinane

    (Transport Research Institute, Napier University, Edinburgh EH10, UK.)

Abstract

Container port accessibility examines the potential or opportunity for the transportation of containerised cargoes within the global liner shipping network. It is also a particularly relevant aspect of port competitiveness since, as previous studies have pointed out, the level of throughput at any container port is significantly and positively correlated to its accessibility. This paper aims not only to generate quantitative estimates of individual container port accessibility, but also to provide a numerical basis for comparing the relative geographical importance of each port. For this purpose, the principal eigenvector method is described and applied to a sample of port data. By supplementing extant technical indicators that relate to port competitiveness, such as port prices and estimates of relative efficiency, with a quantitative measure of port accessibility, the results provide a better understanding of the current structure of the global liner shipping network and the ongoing status of inter-port competition. Maritime Economics & Logistics (2008) 10, 75–89. doi:10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100192

Suggested Citation

  • Yuhong Wang & Kevin Cullinane, 2008. "Measuring Container Port Accessibility: An Application of the Principal Eigenvector Method (PEM)," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 10(1-2), pages 75-89, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:10:y:2008:i:1:p:75-89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/mel/journal/v10/n1/pdf/9100192a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/mel/journal/v10/n1/full/9100192a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Naima Saeed & Kevin Cullinane & Victor Gekara & Prem Chhetri, 2021. "Reconfiguring maritime networks due to the Belt and Road Initiative: impact on bilateral trade flows," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(3), pages 381-400, September.
    2. Kevin Cullinane & Yuhong Wang, 2012. "The hierarchical configuration of the container port industry: an application of multiple linkage analysis," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 169-187, March.
    3. Peter W. de Langen & Maximiliano Udenio & Jan C. Fransoo & Reima Helminen, 2016. "Port connectivity indices: an application to European RoRo shipping," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Dariusz Bernacki & Christian Lis, 2021. "Investigating the Sustainable Impact of Seaport Infrastructure Provision on Maritime Component of Supply Chain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Nguyen Tran & Hans-Dietrich Haasis, 2014. "Empirical analysis of the container liner shipping network on the East-West corridor (1995–2011)," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 121-153, November.
    6. Wang, Yuhong & Cullinane, Kevin, 2016. "Determinants of port centrality in maritime container transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 326-340.
    7. Pisit Jarumaneeroj & Amar Ramudhin & Jorge Barnett Lawton, 2023. "A connectivity-based approach to evaluating port importance in the global container shipping network," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(3), pages 602-622, September.
    8. Achilleas Tsantis & John Mangan & Agustina Calatayud & Roberto Palacin, 2023. "Container shipping: a systematic literature review of themes and factors that influence the establishment of direct connections between countries," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(4), pages 667-697, December.
    9. César Ducruet, 2020. "The geography of maritime networks: A critical review," Post-Print halshs-02922543, HAL.
    10. Tocchi, Daniela & Sys, Christa & Papola, Andrea & Tinessa, Fiore & Simonelli, Fulvio & Marzano, Vittorio, 2022. "Hypergraph-based centrality metrics for maritime container service networks: A worldwide application," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    11. Tovar, Beatriz & Hernández, Rubén & Rodríguez-Déniz, Héctor, 2015. "Container port competitiveness and connectivity: The Canary Islands main ports case," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 40-51.
    12. Vikas Kumar Mishra & Bapi Dutta & Mark Goh & José Rui Figueira & Salvatore Greco, 2021. "A robust ranking of maritime connectivity: revisiting UNCTAD’s liner shipping connectivity index (LSCI)," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(3), pages 424-443, September.
    13. Deng, Ping & Song, Lian & Xiao, Ruiqi & Huang, Chengfeng, 2022. "Evaluation of logistics and port connectivity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 249-267.
    14. Liquan Guo & Zhongzhen Yang, 2019. "Relationship Between Shipping Accessibility and Maritime Transport Demand: the Case of Mainland China," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 149-175, March.
    15. Liu, Qing & Yang, Yang & Ke, Luqi & Ng, Adolf K.Y., 2022. "Structures of port connectivity, competition, and shipping networks in Europe," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    16. Sedat Baştuğ & Hercules Haralambides & Soner Esmer & Enes Eminoğlu, 2021. "Port competitiveness: Do container terminal operators and liner shipping companies see eye to eye?," Post-Print hal-04046233, HAL.
    17. Woo, Su-Han & Pettit, Stephen J. & Kwak, Dong-Wook & Beresford, Anthony K.C., 2011. "Seaport research: A structured literature review on methodological issues since the 1980s," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 667-685, August.
    18. Guo, Jianke & Wang, Ziqi & Yu, Xuhui, 2022. "Accessibility measurement of China's coastal ports from a land-sea coordination perspective - An empirical study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    19. Sugimura, Yoshihisa & Akakura, Yasuhiro & Yotsushima, Tatsuki & Kawasaki, Tomoya, 2023. "Evaluation of Japanese port policies through network analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 59-70.
    20. Güner, Samet & Antunes, Jorge Junio Moreira & Seçkin Codal, Keziban & Wanke, Peter, 2024. "Network centrality driven airport efficiency: A weight-restricted network DEA," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    21. Su-Han Woo & Stephen Pettit & Anthony Beresford & Dong-Wook Kwak, 2012. "Seaport Research: A Decadal Analysis of Trends and Themes Since the 1980s," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 351-377, January.
    22. Ducruet, César, 2020. "The geography of maritime networks: A critical review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    23. Cheung, Kam-Fung & Bell, Michael G.H. & Pan, Jing-Jing & Perera, Supun, 2020. "An eigenvector centrality analysis of world container shipping network connectivity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:marecl:v:10:y:2008:i:1:p:75-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.