IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v66y2015i8p1363-1369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency and equity tradeoffs in voting machine allocation problems

Author

Listed:
  • Xinfang (Jocelyn) Wang

    (Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, USA)

  • Muer Yang

    (University of St. Thomas, Saint Paul, MN, USA)

  • Michael J Fry

    (University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA)

Abstract

Efficiency and equity are the two crucial factors to be considered when allocating public resources such as voting machines. Existing allocation models are all single-objective, focusing on maximizing either efficiency or equity despite the fact that the actual decision-making process involves both issues simultaneously. We propose a bi-objective integer program to analyse the tradeoff between the two competing objectives. The new model quantifies the sacrifice in efficiency in order to achieve a certain improvement in equity and vice versa. Using data from the 2008 United States Presidential election in Franklin County, Ohio, we demonstrate that our model is capable of producing significantly more balanced allocation plans, in terms of efficiency and equity, than current practice or other competing methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinfang (Jocelyn) Wang & Muer Yang & Michael J Fry, 2015. "Efficiency and equity tradeoffs in voting machine allocation problems," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 66(8), pages 1363-1369, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:66:y:2015:i:8:p:1363-1369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v66/n8/pdf/jors2014107a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v66/n8/full/jors2014107a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schmidt, Adam & Albert, Laura A., 2022. "Designing pandemic-resilient voting systems," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    2. Kumar, Sameer & Yang, Muer & Goldschmidt, Kyle H., 2018. "Will aging voting machines cause more voters to experience long waits?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 1-10.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:66:y:2015:i:8:p:1363-1369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.