IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v66y2015i3p369-379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Causal study of low stakeholder engagement in healthcare simulation projects

Author

Listed:
  • Mohsen Jahangirian

    (Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK)

  • Simon J E Taylor

    (Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK)

  • Julie Eatock

    (Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK)

  • Lampros K Stergioulas

    (Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK)

  • Peter M Taylor

    (Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK)

Abstract

Stakeholder engagement plays a fundamental role in the success of ‘operational research’ initiatives including simulation projects. However, there is little empirical evidence of real engagement in the context of healthcare simulation. This paper principally examines this issue and aims to provide insights into the possible causes. The paper reports on the results of a literature review and 10 field studies within the UK healthcare settings, supplemented with the authors’ experience in order to arrive at an initial list of the causes, which will then be tested through a survey of expert opinions. Twelve primary and 26 secondary causal factors, which received statistically significant level of agreement from the experts, are presented in a fish-bone diagram. The findings indicate that communication gap between simulation and stakeholder groups is the top primary factor contributing the most to the poor stakeholder engagement in healthcare simulation projects, followed by ‘poor management support’, ‘clinician’s high workload’ and ‘failure in producing tangible and quick results’.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohsen Jahangirian & Simon J E Taylor & Julie Eatock & Lampros K Stergioulas & Peter M Taylor, 2015. "Causal study of low stakeholder engagement in healthcare simulation projects," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 66(3), pages 369-379, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:66:y:2015:i:3:p:369-379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v66/n3/pdf/jors20141a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v66/n3/full/jors20141a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Baril, Chantal & Gascon, Viviane & Miller, Jonathan & Côté, Nadine, 2016. "Use of a discrete-event simulation in a Kaizen event: A case study in healthcare," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 327-339.
    2. Guillaume Lamé & Oualid Jouini & Julie Stal-Le Cardinal, 2020. "Combining Soft Systems Methodology, Ethnographic Observation and Discrete-Event Simulation: A Case Study in Cancer Care," Post-Print hal-02095031, HAL.
    3. Carter, Michael W. & Busby, Carolyn R., 2023. "How can operational research make a real difference in healthcare? Challenges of implementation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1059-1068.
    4. J H Powell & N Mustafee, 2017. "Widening requirements capture with soft methods: an investigation of hybrid M&S studies in health care," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(10), pages 1211-1222, October.
    5. Harper, Alison & Mustafee, Navonil & Yearworth, Mike, 2021. "Facets of trust in simulation studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(1), pages 197-213.
    6. Proudlove, N.C. & Bisogno, S. & Onggo, B.S.S. & Calabrese, A. & Levialdi Ghiron, N., 2017. "Towards fully-facilitated discrete event simulation modelling: Addressing the model coding stage," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 583-595.
    7. Hongli Lin & Yuming Zhu & Jiahe Zhou & Bingxu Mu & Caihong Liu, 2022. "Stakeholder Engagement Behavior(s) in Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: A Network Embeddedness Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-21, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:66:y:2015:i:3:p:369-379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.