IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v66y2015i2p342-352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling LGD for unsecured retail loans using Bayesian methods

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Bijak

    (University of Southampton, Southampton, UK)

  • Lyn C Thomas

    (University of Southampton, Southampton, UK)

Abstract

Loss Given Default (LGD) is the loss borne by the bank when a customer defaults on a loan. LGD for unsecured retail loans is often found difficult to model. In the frequentist (non-Bayesian) two-step approach, two separate regression models are estimated independently, which can be considered potentially problematic when trying to combine them to make predictions about LGD. The result is a point estimate of LGD for each loan. Alternatively, LGD can be modelled using Bayesian methods. In the Bayesian framework, one can build a single, hierarchical model instead of two separate ones, which makes this a more coherent approach. In this paper, Bayesian methods as well as the frequentist approach are applied to the data on personal loans provided by a large UK bank. As expected, the posterior means of parameters that have been produced using Bayesian methods are very similar to the frequentist estimates. The most important advantage of the Bayesian model is that it generates an individual predictive distribution of LGD for each loan. Potential applications of such distributions include the downturn LGD and the stressed LGD under Basel II.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Bijak & Lyn C Thomas, 2015. "Modelling LGD for unsecured retail loans using Bayesian methods," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 66(2), pages 342-352, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:66:y:2015:i:2:p:342-352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v66/n2/pdf/jors20149a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v66/n2/full/jors20149a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yan Liu & Zhan-jiang Li & Xue-jun Zhen, 2018. "Empirical Study on Indicators Selection Model Based on Nonparametric -Nearest Neighbor Identification and R Clustering Analysis," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-9, April.
    2. Yao, Xiao & Crook, Jonathan & Andreeva, Galina, 2017. "Enhancing two-stage modelling methodology for loss given default with support vector machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 679-689.
    3. Yuta Tanoue & Satoshi Yamashita & Hideaki Nagahata, 2020. "Comparison study of two-step LGD estimation model with probability machines," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 155-177, September.
    4. Jennifer Betz & Ralf Kellner & Daniel Rösch, 2021. "Time matters: How default resolution times impact final loss rates," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(3), pages 619-644, June.
    5. Xia, Yufei & Zhao, Junhao & He, Lingyun & Li, Yinguo & Yang, Xiaoli, 2021. "Forecasting loss given default for peer-to-peer loans via heterogeneous stacking ensemble approach," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1590-1613.
    6. Betz, Jennifer & Kellner, Ralf & Rösch, Daniel, 2018. "Systematic Effects among Loss Given Defaults and their Implications on Downturn Estimation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 1113-1144.
    7. Dimitris Andriosopoulos & Michalis Doumpos & Panos M. Pardalos & Constantin Zopounidis, 2019. "Computational approaches and data analytics in financial services: A literature review," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(10), pages 1581-1599, October.
    8. Aneta Ptak-Chmielewska & Paweł Kopciuszewski, 2024. "Credit loss modelling using beta distribution in a Bayesian approach," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 55(3), pages 313-332.
    9. Chen, Shou & Jiang, Xiangqian & He, Hongbo & Zhou, Xi, 2020. "A pricing model with dynamic repayment flows for guaranteed consumer loans," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1-11.
    10. Do, Hung Xuan & Rösch, Daniel & Scheule, Harald, 2018. "Predicting loss severities for residential mortgage loans: A three-step selection approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(1), pages 246-259.
    11. Jobst, Rainer & Kellner, Ralf & Rösch, Daniel, 2020. "Bayesian loss given default estimation for European sovereign bonds," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1073-1091.
    12. Allan W. Tham & Kazuhiko Kakamu & Shuangzhe Liu, 2023. "Bayesian Statistics for Loan Default," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Bai, Chunguang & Shi, Baofeng & Liu, Feng & Sarkis, Joseph, 2019. "Banking credit worthiness: Evaluating the complex relationships," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 26-38.
    14. Chih-Kang Chu & Ruey-Ching Hwang, 2019. "Predicting Loss Distributions for Small-Size Defaulted-Debt Portfolios Using a Convolution Technique that Allows Probability Masses to Occur at Boundary Points," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 56(1), pages 95-117, August.
    15. Aneta Ptak-Chmielewska & Paweł Kopciuszewski, 2023. "Application of the Bayesian approach in loss given default modelling," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 54(6), pages 625-650.
    16. Tong, Edward N.C. & Mues, Christophe & Brown, Iain & Thomas, Lyn C., 2016. "Exposure at default models with and without the credit conversion factor," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 910-920.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:66:y:2015:i:2:p:342-352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.