IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v65y2014i5p645-659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Independence of the hedging points in PHP control policy

Author

Listed:
  • Z Wang

    (Southeast University, Jiangsu, P.R. China)

  • F T S Chan

    (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

For the control of single machine and multiple part-types manufacturing systems, the prioritized hedging point (PHP) policy is often used. In this paper, the probability distribution of the system states under this control is analysed. Unlike the work by Shu and Perkins (2001), where the maximum production rates for all part-types are identical, we deal with the situation that the maximum production rates for various part-types are different from each other. For this situation, we obtain the independence property of the PHP policy, that is, the marginal probability density function of the production surplus of a specific part-type only relies on the hedging point of itself, but does not depend on the hedging points of other part-types. On the basis of this property, the problem of optimizing the hedging points of the PHP policy can be solved by dividing the single machine and multiple part-types system into a series of equivalent single machine and single part-type systems, the closed form of whose optimal hedging point is known and can be applied directly to optimize the hedging points of the PHP policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Z Wang & F T S Chan, 2014. "Independence of the hedging points in PHP control policy," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 65(5), pages 645-659, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:65:y:2014:i:5:p:645-659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v65/n5/pdf/jors201310a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v65/n5/full/jors201310a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:65:y:2014:i:5:p:645-659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.