IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v56y2005i10d10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601948.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Goal programming and cognitive biases in decision-making

Author

Listed:
  • T J Stewart

    (University of Cape Town)

Abstract

The study of cognitive biases in decision-making has largely arisen within the context of the subjective expected utility school of decision analysis. Many of the behavioural patterns that have been discovered do seem to be relevant to broader areas of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA). In this paper, we look specifically at the judgemental inputs required in implementing goal programming (GP) models. The potential relevance of some of the known cognitive biases in this context are identified, and their impact studied by means of simulation experiments. It is found, inter alia, that biases due to anchoring and adjustment and to avoidance of sure loss can lead to substantial degradation in the performance of GP algorithms. Suggestions for practice and recommendations for follow-up research are derived from the simulation results.

Suggested Citation

  • T J Stewart, 2005. "Goal programming and cognitive biases in decision-making," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(10), pages 1166-1175, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:56:y:2005:i:10:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601948
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601948
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601948
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601948?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theodor J. Stewart, 1988. "Experience with prototype multicriteria decision support systems for pelagic fish quota determination," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(6), pages 719-731, December.
    2. M Bertomeu & C Romero, 2002. "Forest management optimisation models and habitat diversity: a goal programming approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(11), pages 1175-1184, November.
    3. Stewart, Theodor J., 1999. "Evaluation and refinement of aspiration-based methods in MCDM," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(3), pages 643-652, March.
    4. Tamiz, Mehrdad & Jones, Dylan & Romero, Carlos, 1998. "Goal programming for decision making: An overview of the current state-of-the-art," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(3), pages 569-581, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lahtinen, Tuomas J. & Hämäläinen, Raimo P. & Jenytin, Cosmo, 2020. "On preference elicitation processes which mitigate the accumulation of biases in multi-criteria decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 201-210.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stelios Rozakis & Athanasios Kampas, 2022. "An interactive multi-criteria approach to admit new members in international environmental agreements," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3461-3487, September.
    2. Demirci, Mehmet & Bettinger, Pete, 2015. "Using mixed integer multi-objective goal programming for stand tending block designation: A case study from Turkey," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 28-36.
    3. Fleskens, Luuk & Graaff, Jan de, 2010. "Conserving natural resources in olive orchards on sloping land: Alternative goal programming approaches towards effective design of cross-compliance and agri-environmental measures," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(8), pages 521-534, October.
    4. G Mavrotas & E Georgopoulou & S Mirasgedis & Y Sarafidis & D Lalas & V Hontou & N Gakis, 2009. "Multi-objective combinatorial optimization for selecting best available techniques (BAT) in the industrial sector: the COMBAT tool," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(7), pages 906-920, July.
    5. Calvete, Herminia I. & Gale, Carmen & Oliveros, Maria-Jose & Sanchez-Valverde, Belen, 2007. "A goal programming approach to vehicle routing problems with soft time windows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1720-1733, March.
    6. Aouni, Belaid & Kettani, Ossama, 2001. "Goal programming model: A glorious history and a promising future," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 225-231, January.
    7. Pérez-Mesa, Juan Carlos & Galdeano-Gómez, Emilio & Salinas Andújar, Jose A., 2012. "Logistics network and externalities for short sea transport: An analysis of horticultural exports from southeast Spain," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 188-198.
    8. Tamiz, Mehrdad & Jones, Dylan & Romero, Carlos, 2001. "Comments on properties of the minmax solutions in goal programming - a reply," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(3), pages 685-686, June.
    9. Zilla Sinuany-Stern, 2014. "Quadratic model for allocating operational budget in public and nonprofit organizations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 221(1), pages 357-376, October.
    10. Fernando García & Francisco Guijarro & Javier Oliver, 2021. "A Multicriteria Goal Programming Model for Ranking Universities," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Zgajnar, Jaka & Kavcic, Stane, 2011. "Weighted Goal Programming and Penalty Functions: Whole-farm Planning Approach Under Risk," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 118033, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Tamiz, Mehrdad & Azmi, Rania A. & Jones, Dylan F., 2013. "On selecting portfolio of international mutual funds using goal programming with extended factors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 560-576.
    13. Francisco Salas-Molina & Juan Antonio Rodr'iguez Aguilar & Filippo Bistaffa, 2020. "Shared value economics: an axiomatic approach," Papers 2006.00581, arXiv.org.
    14. Michalopoulos, T. & Hogeveen, H. & Heuvelink, E. & Oude Lansink, A.G.J.M., 2013. "Public multi-criteria assessment for societal concerns and gradual labelling," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 97-108.
    15. X Li & P Beullens & D Jones & M Tamiz, 2009. "An integrated queuing and multi-objective bed allocation model with application to a hospital in China," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(3), pages 330-338, March.
    16. Behnam Malakooti, 2015. "Double Helix Value Functions, Ordinal/Cardinal Approach, Additive Utility Functions, Multiple Criteria, Decision Paradigm, Process, and Types (Z Theory I)," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(06), pages 1353-1400, November.
    17. Stewart, Theodor J., 1999. "Evaluation and refinement of aspiration-based methods in MCDM," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(3), pages 643-652, March.
    18. Hocine, Amine & Kouaissah, Noureddine & Bettahar, Samir & Benbouziane, Mohamed, 2018. "Optimizing renewable energy portfolios under uncertainty: A multi-segment fuzzy goal programming approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 540-552.
    19. Stelios Rozakis & Alexandra Sintori & Konstantinos Tsiboukas, 2009. "Utility-derived Supply Function of Sheep Milk: The Case of Etoloakarnania, Greece," Working Papers 2009-11, Agricultural University of Athens, Department Of Agricultural Economics.
    20. Zhao, Siwei & Liu, Weidong & Zhu, Mengyuan & Ma, Yanfang & Li, Zongmin, 2021. "A priority-based multi-objective framework for water resources diversion and allocation in the middle route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    decision analysis; goal programming;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:56:y:2005:i:10:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.