Author
Listed:
- G Tomas M Hult
(Eli Broad Graduate School of Management, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA)
- David J Ketchen
(Auburn University, Auburn, USA)
- David A Griffith
(Eli Broad Graduate School of Management, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA)
- Brian R Chabowski
(University of Tulsa, Tulsa, USA)
- Mary K Hamman
(Eli Broad Graduate School of Management, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA)
- Bernadine Johnson Dykes
(Eli Broad Graduate School of Management, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA)
- Wesley A Pollitte
(Eli Broad Graduate School of Management, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA)
- S Tamer Cavusgil
(Eli Broad Graduate School of Management, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA)
Abstract
A sizeable body of international business (IB) research is devoted to building knowledge about the determinants of organizational performance. A key precursor to accurately diagnosing why some organizations succeed in the international marketplace while others struggle is operationalizing performance appropriately. Yet, to date, no systematic investigation has considered how well IB research measures performance. We examine the measurement of performance in 96 articles published in the Academy of Management Journal, Administrative Science Quarterly, Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of International Business Studies, Management Science, Organization Science, and the Strategic Management Journal between 1995 and 2005. The findings reveal that most studies do not measure performance in a manner that captures the multifaceted nature of the construct. We describe the implications of these results, and offer suggestions for improving future practice. Journal of International Business Studies (2008) 39, 1064–1080. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400398
Suggested Citation
G Tomas M Hult & David J Ketchen & David A Griffith & Brian R Chabowski & Mary K Hamman & Bernadine Johnson Dykes & Wesley A Pollitte & S Tamer Cavusgil, 2008.
"An assessment of the measurement of performance in international business research,"
Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 39(6), pages 1064-1080, September.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:jintbs:v:39:y:2008:i:6:p:1064-1080
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jintbs:v:39:y:2008:i:6:p:1064-1080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.