IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/gpprii/v34y2009i2p242-259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Life Insurers' Asset Allocation Strategies Influence Performance within the Enterprise Risk Framework?

Author

Listed:
  • Etti G Baranoff

    (School of Business, Virginia Commonwealth University, Snead Hall, 301 West Main Street, Richmond, VA 23284-4000, U.S.A)

  • Thomas W Sager

    (Department of Information, Risk, and Operations Management, The University of Texas at Austin, CBA 5.202, Austin, TX 78712-1175, U.S.A.)

Abstract

In this paper we examine the impact of asset allocation strategies on the investment performance of life insurers in the U.S. We are especially interested in comparing the effects of active portfolio management to the effects of passive holding strategies. We define three novel quantitative indices of static/dynamic strategies to represent important dimensions of the active/passive spectrum of investment strategies. The indices are computed from portfolio allocations reported in the firms’ annual statement data. Using cluster analysis, we partition the population of life insurers into three groups, characterised by generally having static (passive), dynamic (active) and mixed asset allocation strategies, respectively. There are major differences among the three clusters in terms of risk profile, size and other factors. We model investment performance and allocations among the major holdings of bonds, stocks, cash and mortgages explicitly as simultaneously interacting phenomena. In order to isolate the effect of allocation strategies from the confounding effects of other risks, we imbed a spectrum of enterprise risks, treated as exogenous or predetermined, within the model framework of endogenously interacting performance and asset allocation variables. The strategy indicators are also exogenous variables. We find that the most active cluster enjoys the greatest relative performance, even controlling for allocations among asset classes. The Geneva Papers (2009) 34, 242–259. doi:10.1057/gpp.2009.5

Suggested Citation

  • Etti G Baranoff & Thomas W Sager, 2009. "Do Life Insurers' Asset Allocation Strategies Influence Performance within the Enterprise Risk Framework?," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 34(2), pages 242-259, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:gpprii:v:34:y:2009:i:2:p:242-259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/gpp/journal/v34/n2/pdf/gpp20095a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/gpp/journal/v34/n2/full/gpp20095a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bijapur, Mohan & Croci, Manuela & Zaidi, Rida, 2012. "Do asset regulations impede portfolio diversification? evidence from European life insurance funds," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 56618, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Tsai-Jyh Chen, 0. "The role of distribution channels in market discipline for the life insurance industry," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    3. Bijapur, Mohan & Croci, Manuela & Zaidi, Rida, 2012. "Do Asset Regulations Impede Portfolio Diversification? Evidence from European Life Insurance Funds," MPRA Paper 54265, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Tsai-Jyh Chen, 2021. "The role of distribution channels in market discipline for the life insurance industry," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 46(1), pages 107-129, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:gpprii:v:34:y:2009:i:2:p:242-259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.