IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/eurjdr/v35y2023i2d10.1057_s41287-023-00578-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How are Research for Development Programmes Implementing and Evaluating Equitable Partnerships to Address Power Asymmetries?

Author

Listed:
  • Mieke Snijder

    (Institute of Development Studies)

  • Rosie Steege

    (Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales Sede (FLACSO))

  • Michelle Callander

    (London School of Economics and Political Science)

  • Michel Wahome

    (University of Strathclyde)

  • M. Feisal Rahman

    (Northumbria University)

  • Marina Apgar

    (Institute of Development Studies)

  • Sally Theobald

    (Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales Sede (FLACSO))

  • Louise J. Bracken

    (Northumbria University)

  • Laura Dean

    (Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales Sede (FLACSO))

  • Bintu Mansaray

    (College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences)

  • Prasanna Saligram

    (George Institute for Global Health India)

  • Surekha Garimella

    (George Institute for Global Health India)

  • Sophia Arthurs-Hartnett

    (Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales Sede (FLACSO))

  • Robinson Karuga

    (LVCT Health)

  • Adriana Elizabeth Mejía Artieda

    (Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine)

  • Victoria Chengo

    (Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales Sede (FLACSO))

  • Joanes Ateles

    (African Centre for Technology Studies (ACTs))

Abstract

The complexity of issues addressed by research for development (R4D) requires collaborations between partners from a range of disciplines and cultural contexts. Power asymmetries within such partnerships may obstruct the fair distribution of resources, responsibilities and benefits across all partners. This paper presents a cross-case analysis of five R4D partnership evaluations, their methods and how they unearthed and addressed power asymmetries. It contributes to the field of R4D partnership evaluations by detailing approaches and methods employed to evaluate these partnerships. Theory-based evaluations deepened understandings of how equitable partnerships contribute to R4D generating impact and centring the relational side of R4D. Participatory approaches that involved all partners in developing and evaluating partnership principles ensured contextually appropriate definitions and a focus on what partners value.

Suggested Citation

  • Mieke Snijder & Rosie Steege & Michelle Callander & Michel Wahome & M. Feisal Rahman & Marina Apgar & Sally Theobald & Louise J. Bracken & Laura Dean & Bintu Mansaray & Prasanna Saligram & Surekha Gar, 2023. "How are Research for Development Programmes Implementing and Evaluating Equitable Partnerships to Address Power Asymmetries?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 35(2), pages 351-379, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:35:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1057_s41287-023-00578-w
    DOI: 10.1057/s41287-023-00578-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41287-023-00578-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41287-023-00578-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irene Guijt, 2014. "Participatory Approaches: Methodological Briefs - Impact Evaluation No. 5," Papers innpub750, Methodological Briefs.
    2. Annemarie Paassen & Charity Osei-Amponsah & Laurens Klerkx & Barbara Mierlo & George Owusu Essegbey, 2022. "Partnerships Blending Institutional Logics for Inclusive Global and Regional Food Value Chains in Ghana; with What Smallholder Effect?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(5), pages 2179-2203, October.
    3. Cornwall, Andrea & Aghajanian, Alia, 2017. "How to Find out What’s Really Going On: Understanding Impact through Participatory Process Evaluation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 173-185.
    4. repec:mpr:mprres:7320 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. van Paassen, A. & Osei-Amponsah, Charity & Klerkx, L. & van Mierlo, B. & Essegbey, G. O., 2022. "Partnerships blending institutional logics for inclusive global and regional food value chains in Ghana; with what smallholder effect?," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 1-25.().
    6. Marleen Dekker & Nicky Pouw, 2022. "Introduction to the Special Issue: Policies for Inclusive Development in Africa," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(5), pages 2137-2155, October.
    7. Mayne, John, 2008. "Contribution analysis: An approach to exploring cause and effect," ILAC Briefs 52525, Institutional Learning and Change (ILAC) Initiative.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Domenico Dentoni & Carlo Cucchi & Marija Roglić & Rob Lubberink & Rahmin Bender & Timothy Manyise, 2023. "Systems Thinking, Mapping and Change in Food and Agriculture," Post-Print hal-04002011, HAL.
    2. Terrapon-Pfaff, Julia & Gröne, Marie-Christine & Dienst, Carmen & Ortiz, Willington, 2018. "Productive use of energy – Pathway to development? Reviewing the outcomes and impacts of small-scale energy projects in the global south," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 198-209.
    3. Dunne, Máiréad & Humphreys, Sara, 2022. "The edu-workscape: Re-conceptualizing the relationship between work and education in rural children’s lives in Sub-Saharan Africa," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 27(C).
    4. Purkus, Alexandra & Lüdtke, Jan, 2020. "A systemic evaluation framework for a multi-actor, forest-based bioeconomy governance process: The German Charter for Wood 2.0 as a case study," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    5. Holzapfel, Sarah & Römling, Cornelia, 2020. "Monitoring in German bilateral development cooperation: A case study of agricultural, rural development and food security projects," IDOS Discussion Papers 18/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    6. Boadu, Evans Sakyi & Ile, Isioma, 2019. "Between power and perception: Understanding youth perspectives in participatory monitoring and evaluation (PM&E) in Ghana," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    7. Samantha Shewchuk & James Wallace & Mia Seibold, 2023. "Evaluations of training programs to improve capacity in K*: a systematic scoping review of methods applied and outcomes assessed," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. De Marinis, Pietro & Sali, Guido, 2020. "Participatory analytic hierarchy process for resource allocation in agricultural development projects," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    9. Alessia Spada & Mariantonietta Fiore & Umberto Monarca & Nicola Faccilongo, 2019. "R&D Expenditure for New Technology in Livestock Farming: Impact on GHG Reduction in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Erica Wimbush, 2010. "Debate: Accountability for outcomes— international lessons," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 8-10, January.
    11. D. J. H. te Lintelo & K. Pittore, 2021. "Evaluating Parliamentary Advocacy for Nutrition in Tanzania," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(3), pages 735-759, June.
    12. Mark Smith & Heather Wilkinson & Michael Gallagher, 2013. "'It's what gets through people's radars isn't it': relationships in social work practice and knowledge exchange," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 292-306, November.
    13. Ramirez, Luisa F. & Belcher, Brian M., 2020. "Crossing the science-policy interface: Lessons from a research project on Brazil nut management in Peru," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    14. Sylvain K Cibangu, 2018. "Misunderstandings of Capability Approach: Towards Paradigm Pluralism," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 9(2), pages 54-72.
    15. Janssens, Frans J.G. & Ehren, Melanie C.M., 2016. "Toward a model of school inspections in a polycentric system," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 88-98.
    16. Terrapon-Pfaff, Julia & Gröne, Marie-Christine & Dienst, Carmen & Ortiz, Willington, 2018. "Impact pathways of small-scale energy projects in the global south – Findings from a systematic evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 84-94.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:35:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1057_s41287-023-00578-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.