IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/eurjdr/v28y2016i1p30-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The European Union and Policy Coherence for Development: Reforms, Results, Resistance

Author

Listed:
  • Maurizio Carbone

    (University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK)

  • Niels Keijzer

    (Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE), Bonn, Germany)

Abstract

This article discusses the trajectory of policy coherence for development (PCD) in the European Union (EU). In particular, it argues that the strong focus on institutional mechanisms, conceived as a way of overcoming different types of resistance, has had the effect that results achieved have by no means been commensurate with the expectations raised by the various reforms launched over the years. EU Member States have paid lip service to the importance of PCD without translating commitments into more coherent (national and supranational) policies. Moroever, an analysis of the Impact Assessment (IA) – one of the key mechanisms to promote PCD at EU level – prepared for the reform of the EU’s agricultural and fisheries policies in 2011–2013 shows how bureaucratic arrangements have substantially failed to clarify the real impact of EU policies on (different types of) developing countries. The conclusion is that successful promotion of PCD is more than just having the right arguments and ensuring sufficient technical support, but is first and foremost a political undertaking.

Suggested Citation

  • Maurizio Carbone & Niels Keijzer, 2016. "The European Union and Policy Coherence for Development: Reforms, Results, Resistance," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 28(1), pages 30-43, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:28:y:2016:i:1:p:30-43
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejdr/journal/v28/n1/pdf/ejdr201572a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejdr/journal/v28/n1/full/ejdr201572a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Harlan Koff & Antony Challenger & Israel Portillo, 2020. "Guidelines for Operationalizing Policy Coherence for Development (PCD) as a Methodology for the Design and Implementation of Sustainable Development Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Aydin Yildirim & Robert Basedow & Matteo Fiorini & Bernard Hoekman, 2021. "EU Trade and Non‐trade Objectives: New Survey Evidence on Policy Design and Effectiveness," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 556-568, May.
    3. Mark Furness & Stefan Gänzle, 2017. "The Security–Development Nexus in European Union Foreign Relations after Lisbon: Policy Coherence at Last?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35(4), pages 475-492, July.
    4. Niels Keijzer & Lina Galvis & Sarah Delputte, 2024. "Whose policy coherence counts? Assessing sustainable fisheries in Ghana and the European Union's engagement," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 42(1), January.
    5. Alexandra Berger, 2022. "Development as non‐migration? Examining normative and policy coherence in EU external action on migration and development," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(S1), June.
    6. Harlan Koff & Sandra Häbel, 2022. "Normative coherence for development: What relevance for responsive regionalism?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(S1), June.
    7. Niestroy, Ingeborg, 2016. "How are we getting ready? The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in the EU and its Member States: analysis and action so far," IDOS Discussion Papers 9/2016, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    8. Rudolph, Alexandra, 2017. "The concept of SDG-sensitive development cooperation: implications for OECD-DAC members," IDOS Discussion Papers 1/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    9. Henökl, Thomas, 2016. "Comparing structure and organisation of development bureaucracies in Europe: a pilot study of European aid administrations," IDOS Discussion Papers 27/2016, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    10. Hoekman, Bernard & Shingal, Anirudh, 2024. "Development Goals, commercial interest and EU Aid-for-Trade," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    11. Sandra Häbel & Harlan Koff & Marie Adam, 2022. "Normative coherence for development and regionalism: Gender equality in ASEAN's migration policies," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(S1), June.
    12. Zeigermann, Ulrike & Böcher, Michael, 2020. "Challenges for bridging the gap between knowledge and governance in sustainability policy – The case of OECD ‘Focal Points’ for Policy Coherence for Development," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    13. Scholz, Imme & Keijzer, Niels & Richerzhagen, Carmen, 2016. "Promoting the Sustainable Development Goals in Germany," IDOS Discussion Papers 13/2016, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    14. Alexander Brand & Mark Furness & Niels Keijzer, 2021. "Promoting Policy Coherence within the 2030 Agenda Framework: Externalities, Trade-Offs and Politics," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 108-118.
    15. Hannah Kosow & Sandra Wassermann & Stephan Bartke & Paul Goede & Detlef Grimski & Ines Imbert & Till Jenssen & Oliver Laukel & Matthias Proske & Jochen Protzer & Kim Philip Schumacher & Stefan Siedent, 2022. "Addressing Goal Conflicts: New Policy Mixes for Commercial Land Use Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-26, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:28:y:2016:i:1:p:30-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.