IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/eurjdr/v25y2013i3p445-465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Husbands, Wives and the Peculiar Economics of Household Public Goods

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda J Felkey

    (Department of Economics and Business, Lake Forest College, Lake Forest, USA)

Abstract

Understanding how household income is allocated among different types of expenditures is of the utmost importance when considering policy targeted at increasing household well-being. This analysis uses the collective household model to determine how household public goods and household public bads are chosen in light of the relative power balance between husband and wife. This article shows both theoretically and empirically that the effect of additional female power on household outcomes depends on the initial level of female power. Moreover, contrary to previous findings, it need not always be positive. The policy implications of this non-monotonic relationship between female decision-making power and household well-being outcomes are important. The effectiveness of aid to households depends not only on current expenditure levels but also on household balance of power. More specifically, there may be situations where enhancing female power (more controversially, and the article shows this theoretically and empirically) may not be good for household well-being.Comprendre comment les revenus des ménages sont répartis en différentes catégories de dépenses est essentiel dès lors que l’on envisage une politique destinée à améliorer le bien-être des ménages. Cette analyse utilise le modèle collectif de comportement des ménages afin de déterminer comment s’effectuent les arbitrages entre les biens publics et les maux publics des ménages compte tenu de l’équilibre relatif des pouvoirs entre conjoints. Nous montrons théoriquement et empiriquement que l’effet du gain de pouvoir des femmes sur les résultats des ménages dépend de leur niveau de pouvoir initial. Et, contrairement à ce qu’ont montré des études précédentes, il n’est pas toujours nécessaire que cet effet soit positif. Les implications en matière de politiques de cette relation non monotone entre le pouvoir décisionnel des femmes et les résultats par rapport au bien-être des ménages sont importantes. L’efficacité de l’aide aux ménages dépend non seulement des niveaux de dépenses actuels, mais aussi de l’équilibre des pouvoirs dans les ménages. Plus précisément, il y a des situations où l’augmentation du pouvoir des femmes peut ne pas être bonne pour le bien-être des ménages (ce qui est matière à controverse, mais l’article le montre théoriquement et empiriquement).

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda J Felkey, 2013. "Husbands, Wives and the Peculiar Economics of Household Public Goods," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 25(3), pages 445-465, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:25:y:2013:i:3:p:445-465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejdr/journal/v25/n3/pdf/ejdr201256a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejdr/journal/v25/n3/full/ejdr201256a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frederik Booysen & Sevias Guvuriro, 2021. "Gender Differences in Intra-Household Financial Decision-Making: An Application of Coarsened Exact Matching," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-11, October.
    2. Vidya Atal, 2017. "Say at home, or stay at home? Policy implications on female labor supply and empowerment," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1081-1103, December.
    3. Fernandez, Antonia & Kambhampati, Uma S., 2017. "Shared agency: The dominant spouse’s impact on education expenditure," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 182-197.
    4. Teresa Perry, 2024. "Why Don’t You Leave? A Household Bargaining Model with a Household Preference of Addiction," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 50(3), pages 307-336, June.
    5. Fernandez, Antonia & Della Giusta, Marina & Kambhampati, Uma S., 2015. "The Intrinsic Value of Agency: The Case of Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 92-107.
    6. Roy Chowdhury, Soumi & Bohara, Alok K. & Horn, Brady P., 2018. "Balance of Power, Domestic Violence, and Health Injuries: Evidence from Demographic and Health Survey of Nepal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 18-29.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:25:y:2013:i:3:p:445-465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.