IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/eurjdr/v24y2012i4p589-605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political Conflict and Entangled Social Logics in the Development of Institutional Capacity: Creating a Designated National Authority for the Clean Development Mechanism in Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Karen Holm Olsen

    (Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark.)

Abstract

Institutional capacity development is commonly conceptualised in an instrumental way; the concern is how to implement policy and realise project designs by aligning institutional realities with policy prescriptions. When assessed against project aims, capacity development interventions are often partially successful and sometimes unsuccessful. Inspired by an actor-oriented approach to understanding the processes and outcomes of institutional capacity development, this article argues that the real logics of actors are not in line with the formal ideas and assumptions of the project. This argument is based on a case study of a project to develop capacity for the Clean Development Mechanism in Uganda implemented over 4 years in the mid-2000s. This article concludes that the politics of processes of institutional change are largely ignored in an instrumental approach, and, contrary to project expectations, the inputs of intervention are appropriated by actors in ways that run counter to the projects' objectives and methods.Le développement des capacités institutionnelles est généralement conceptualisé de manière instrumentale; L’enjeu est de déterminer comment mettre en place des politiques et élaborer des projets en adaptant les réalités institutionnelles aux prescriptions politiques. Quand on évalue les mesures mises en œuvre pour développer les capacités, on constate qu’elles sont souvent partiellement couronnées de succès et qu’elles se soldent parfois par des échecs, au regard des objectifs des projets. Inspiré d’une approche axée sur les acteurs pour comprendre les processus et résultats du développement des capacités institutionnelles, cet article cherche à montrer que les logiques réelles des acteurs ne correspondent pas aux idées et hypothèses des projets qui sont énoncées. Cet argumentaire s’appuie sur une étude d’un projet de développement des capacités pour le Mécanisme de Développement Propre mis en place en Ouganda sur une période de quatre ans au milieu de la décennie 2000. L’article conclut que la politique de processus de changement institutionnel est très peu prise en compte par une approche instrumentale et que les acteurs se sont appropriés les apports des mesures prises d’une manière qui va à l’encontre des objectifs et méthodes des projets.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen Holm Olsen, 2012. "Political Conflict and Entangled Social Logics in the Development of Institutional Capacity: Creating a Designated National Authority for the Clean Development Mechanism in Uganda," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 24(4), pages 589-605, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:24:y:2012:i:4:p:589-605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejdr/journal/v24/n4/pdf/ejdr20121a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejdr/journal/v24/n4/full/ejdr20121a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:24:y:2012:i:4:p:589-605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.