IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/eurjdr/v23y2011i3p409-425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why the European Commission Fails to Adhere to the Principles of Good Donorship: The Case of the Governance Incentive Tranche

Author

Listed:
  • Nadia Molenaers

    (Institute of Development Policy and Management, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Leen Nijs

    (Institute of Development Policy and Management, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium)

Abstract

The European Commission (EC) launched a new aid instrument: the ‘governance incentive tranche’, to incentivise African, Caribbean, Pacific (ACP)-governments to carry out governance reforms. This new initiative fails to incorporate the principles spurred by the aid effectiveness debate, to which the EC has committed itself. This article sets out to understand the gap between discourse and practice and argues that in order to fully grasp the complexity of donor behaviour, domestic issues and political arrangements have to be brought into the analysis. The incentive tranche illustrates how the complexity of the European construction makes the formulation of a coherent policy exceptionally difficult.La Commission Européenne a introduit un nouvel instrument d’aide, ‘la Tranche Incitative pour la bonne Gouvernance’, afin d’inciter les gouvernements des pays in French ACP à mettre en œuvre des réformes de gouvernance. Cette nouvelle initiative n’intègre pas les principes émanant du débat sur l’efficacité de l’aide, principes que la Commission s’est engagée à respecter. Cet article cherche à comprendre ce décalage entre le discours et la pratique et soutient que pour appréhender pleinement la complexité des comportements des pays donateurs, il faut prendre en compte dans l’analyse les questions locales et les accords politiques. La tranche incitative illustre bien à quel point la complexité de la construction Européenne rend difficile l’élaboration d’une politique cohérente.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadia Molenaers & Leen Nijs, 2011. "Why the European Commission Fails to Adhere to the Principles of Good Donorship: The Case of the Governance Incentive Tranche," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 23(3), pages 409-425, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:23:y:2011:i:3:p:409-425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejdr/journal/v23/n3/pdf/ejdr20115a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejdr/journal/v23/n3/full/ejdr20115a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Molenaers, Nadia & Dellepiane, Sebastian & Faust, Jorg, 2015. "Political Conditionality and Foreign Aid," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 2-12.
    2. Ramin Dadasov, 2017. "European Aid and Governance: Does the Source Matter?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(2), pages 269-288, April.
    3. Koch, Svea, 2015. "A Typology of Political Conditionality Beyond Aid: Conceptual Horizons Based on Lessons from the European Union," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 97-108.
    4. Jan Orbie & Sarah Delputte & Fabienne Bossuyt & Petra Debusscher & Karen Del Biondo & Vicky Reynaert & Joren Verschaeve, 2017. "The Normative Distinctiveness of the European Union in International Development: Stepping Out of the Shadow of the World Bank?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35(4), pages 493-511, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:23:y:2011:i:3:p:409-425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.