IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/eurjdr/v21y2009i2p264-282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equal Numbers, Equal Chances? A Case Study of Gender Differences in the Distribution of Social Capital in Smallholder Farmer Groups in Búzi District, Mozambique

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabeth Gotschi

    ([1] aUniversit&aauml;t für Bodenkultur (BOKU)[2] bCentro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT))

  • Jemimah Njuki

    (Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT))

  • Robert Delve

    (Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT))

Abstract

Despite the potential for local groups to contribute to rural development, it remains questionable whether social capital – as the ‘missing link’ in development – is compatible with the idea of gender equity strived for in ‘gender mainstreamed’ development projects. This paper examines engendered differences in smallholder farmer groups in Búzi district, and how social capital is generated and distributed. Although men and women equally invest in groups, in terms of participation in group activities or contribution of communal work, the benefits of social capital are significantly unequally distributed. Women find it harder to transform the number of social relations into improved information, access to markets or help in case of need.Malgré le potentiel des groupes locaux pour contribuer au développement rural, il n'est pas certain que le capital social, en tant que chaînon manquant du développement, soit compatible avec le principe d'équité de genre recherchée par les projets de développement sensibles à la question du genre. Cet article examine les différences générées par des groupes de petits exploitants agricoles dans le district de Búzi et comment le capital social est créé et distribué. Alors qu'hommes et femmes investissent de façon équivalente, en termes de participation aux activités des groupes ou de contribution au travail communautaire, les bénéfices du capital social sont distribués de façon sensiblement inégale. Les femmes ont plus de difficultés à transformer les relations sociales en un meilleur accès à l'information, aux marchés ou en aide en cas de besoin.European Journal of Development Research (2009) 21, 264–282. doi:10.1057/ejdr.2008.20

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabeth Gotschi & Jemimah Njuki & Robert Delve, 2009. "Equal Numbers, Equal Chances? A Case Study of Gender Differences in the Distribution of Social Capital in Smallholder Farmer Groups in Búzi District, Mozambique," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 21(2), pages 264-282, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:21:y:2009:i:2:p:264-282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejdr/journal/v21/n2/pdf/ejdr2008120a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejdr/journal/v21/n2/full/ejdr2008120a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rahi Jain & Prashant Narnaware, 2018. "Role of Local Context in the Success of Farmer Collectives: A Review," Millennial Asia, , vol. 9(3), pages 318-335, December.
    2. Kaaria, Susan & Osorio, Martha & Wagner, Sophie & Gallina, Ambra, 2016. "Rural women’s participation in producer organizations: An analysis of the barriers that women face and strategies to foster equitable and effective participation," Journal of Gender, Agriculture and Food Security (Agri-Gender), Africa Centre for Gender, Social Research and Impact Assessment, vol. 1(2).
    3. Fischer, Elisabeth & Qaim, Matin, 2012. "Gender, Agricultural Commercialization, and Collective Action in Kenya," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126659, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Meinzen-Dick, R., 2010. "Engendering agricultural research," IWMI Working Papers H043604, International Water Management Institute.
      • Meinzen-Dick, Ruth & Quisumbing, Agnes & Behrman, Julia & Biermayr-Jenzano, Patricia & Wilde, Vicki & Noordeloos, Marco & Ragasa, Catherine & Beintema, Nienke, 2010. "Engendering agricultural research," IFPRI discussion papers 973, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Promita Mukherjee & Biswajit Ray & Rabindra N. Bhattacharya, 2017. "Status differences in collective action and forest benefits: evidence from joint forest management in India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 1831-1854, October.
    6. R. Ochago & M. N. Mangheni & R. F. Miiro, 2016. "Gender and social economic factors affecting IPM knowledge acquisition and application: A case study of coffee farmer group members in bugisu, Uganda," Asian Journal of Agriculture and rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 6(9), pages 175-187, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:21:y:2009:i:2:p:264-282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.