IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/ecolmr/v3y2009i6p51-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a unit labour costs indicator for the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Alex Turvey

    (Office for National Statistics)

Abstract

This article showcases ongoing work within ONS to develop a new unit labour costs indicator for the UK by building upon the existing unit wage costs series. It begins by examining the concept of unit wage costs, describing what the series aims to measure and explaining some of the conceptual difficulties when estimating data in practice. The first issue concerns the series used to measure the labour costs of employees; wages and salaries are currently used instead of the more comprehensive compensation of employees (CoE) series. Secondly, the labour costs of the self-employed are not satisfactorily estimated by the current method. Two possible methods for the development of a unit labour costs measure are outlined; both incorporate CoE as their employee labour costs measure, but take different approaches to estimating the labour costs of the self-employed. The article concludes that the preferred model for estimating unit labour costs proxies self-employed labour costs by applying the ratio of CoE to the sum of CoE and gross operating surplus in the employed sector to mixed income, a measure of total earnings in the selfemployed sector. Economic & Labour Market Review (2009) 3, 51–56; doi:10.1057/elmr.2009.91

Suggested Citation

  • Alex Turvey, 2009. "Developing a unit labour costs indicator for the UK," Economic & Labour Market Review, Palgrave Macmillan;Office for National Statistics, vol. 3(6), pages 51-56, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:ecolmr:v:3:y:2009:i:6:p:51-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/elmr/journal/v3/n6/pdf/elmr200991a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/elmr/journal/v3/n6/full/elmr200991a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:ecolmr:v:3:y:2009:i:6:p:51-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.