IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/ecolmr/v2y2008i8p25-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inventories: a cross-country comparison of behaviour and methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Barry Williams

    (Office for National Statistics)

Abstract

Highlights relationships within component inventories data,between GDP and inventories and the relative importance of individual sectors' holdingsThere are a number of contrasting economic theories regarding companies’ motivations for holding inventories. One theory suggests firms use inventories to smooth production levels over time in response to demand; another suggests firms have an optimal range of inventory levels which they will maintain by varying production levels. The purpose of this article is not to solve this debate but instead to highlight the relationships within component inventories data, the relationships between gross domestic product and inventories and the relative importance of individual sectors’ holdings within the series as a whole. Subsequently, a comparison of official data and external survey data within the UK will be discussed. In addition, the article aims to highlight the difficulty in measuring inventory data and discusses issues surrounding methodology. Economic & Labour Market Review (2008) 2, 25–31; doi:10.1057/elmr.2008.120

Suggested Citation

  • Barry Williams, 2008. "Inventories: a cross-country comparison of behaviour and methodology," Economic & Labour Market Review, Palgrave Macmillan;Office for National Statistics, vol. 2(8), pages 25-31, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:ecolmr:v:2:y:2008:i:8:p:25-31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/elmr/journal/v2/n8/pdf/elmr2008120a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/elmr/journal/v2/n8/full/elmr2008120a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:ecolmr:v:2:y:2008:i:8:p:25-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.