IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/develp/v47y2004i4p35-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What We Know and What We Believe: Lessons from cognitive psychology

Author

Listed:
  • Ron Bradfield

Abstract

Most of what is known about scenarios comes from three sources: articles in the practitioner literature describing how scenario planning is undertaken; articles from the ‘future research’ literature that offer models for constructing scenarios, and a small body of research based on empirical studies of related topics. It is this third source that Ron Bradfield discusses as he draws out possible lessons from research for scenario practitioners. Development (2004) 47, 35–42. doi:10.1057/palgrave.development.1100093

Suggested Citation

  • Ron Bradfield, 2004. "What We Know and What We Believe: Lessons from cognitive psychology," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 47(4), pages 35-42, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:develp:v:47:y:2004:i:4:p:35-42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/development/journal/v47/n4/pdf/1100093a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/development/journal/v47/n4/full/1100093a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sisto, Roberta & Lopolito, Antonio & van Vliet, Mathijs, 2018. "Stakeholder participation in planning rural development strategies: Using backcasting to support Local Action Groups in complying with CLLD requirements," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 442-450.
    2. Rozanne Spijkerboer, "undated". "The use of scenario planning as a tool in US public spatial planning practice," NEURUS papers neurusp185, NEURUS - Network of European and US Regional and Urban Studies.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:develp:v:47:y:2004:i:4:p:35-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.