IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/assmgt/v25y2024i7d10.1057_s41260-024-00360-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wealth and familiarity bias: sin stocks investment in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Hamdan

    (Cardiff Metropolitan University)

  • Pedro Fernandez Calavia

    (Cardiff Metropolitan University)

  • Nasir Aminu

    (Cardiff Metropolitan University)

Abstract

Our study investigates the relationship between European society’s wealth and how they invest in sin stocks—stocks of listed firms involved in producing tobacco, alcohol, and gambling goods and services returns. Using time series data from 24 European countries from 2000 to 2020 to check the performance of sin stocks, we tested 3 hypotheses to explore the possibility that sin stock returns are related to the wealth of the countries they are based on and to the levels of consumption of alcohol and gambling in those countries. Three quantitative methods are used to measure risk-adjusted returns of the sin stocks: the CAPM single-factor or market model, the Fama-French 3-factor model, and the Fama-French 5-factor model. We found significant evidence of the existence of abnormal returns. The evidence supports that sin stocks have a significant relation with the market, lower volatility, and have better risk-adjusted returns during times of economic downturn. Our results show that sin stocks from the wealthier Northern European countries yield higher risk-adjusted returns than their Southern and Easter European counterparts. We found familiarity bias in gambling sin stocks, which suggests that getting used to something seen as sinful can lead to a lower feeling of rejection. As it is common in behavioural finance, behind the data and numbers of the financial markets, ordinary human behaviour is an essential explanation that defies the orthodox concepts of mathematical efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Hamdan & Pedro Fernandez Calavia & Nasir Aminu, 2024. "Wealth and familiarity bias: sin stocks investment in Europe," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(7), pages 714-725, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:assmgt:v:25:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1057_s41260-024-00360-5
    DOI: 10.1057/s41260-024-00360-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41260-024-00360-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41260-024-00360-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koedijk, Kees & ter Horst, Jenke & Borgers, Arian & Derwall, Jeroen, 2015. "Do Social Factors Influence Investment Behaviour and Performance? Evidence from Mutual Fund Holdings," CEPR Discussion Papers 10740, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Christina E. Bannier & Yannik Bofinger & Björn Rock, 2023. "The risk-return tradeoff: are sustainable investors compensated adequately?," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(3), pages 165-172, May.
    3. Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 2015. "A five-factor asset pricing model," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 1-22.
    4. Steven F. Cahan & Chen Chen & Li Chen, 2017. "Social Norms and CSR Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 493-508, October.
    5. Fang, Yiwei & Fiordelisi, Franco & Hasan, Iftekhar & Leung, Woon Sau & Wong, Gabriel, 2023. "Corporate culture and firm value: Evidence from crisis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    6. Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 1993. "Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 3-56, February.
    7. Fauver, Larry & McDonald, Michael B., 2014. "International variation in sin stocks and its effects on equity valuation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 173-187.
    8. Hong, Harrison & Kacperczyk, Marcin, 2009. "The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 15-36, July.
    9. David Blitz & Laurens Swinkels, 2023. "Does excluding sin stocks cost performance?," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 1693-1710, October.
    10. Jianhua Liu & Wei Li, 2018. "Bibliometric Analysis of Spatial Econometrics," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Madjid Tavana & Srikanta Patnaik (ed.), Recent Developments in Data Science and Business Analytics, chapter 0, pages 373-379, Springer.
    11. Olivier David Zerbib, 2022. "A Sustainable Capital Asset Pricing Model (S-CAPM): Evidence from Environmental Integration and Sin Stock Exclusion [Asset pricing with liquidity risk]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(6), pages 1345-1388.
    12. Sebastian Lobe & Christian Walkshäusl, 2016. "Vice versus virtue investing around the world," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 303-344, March.
    13. Xing Han & Youwei Li & Olena Onishchenko, 2022. "Shunned stocks and market states," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(7), pages 705-717, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Al-Awadhi, Abdullah M. & Dempsey, Michael, 2017. "Social norms and market outcomes: The effects of religious beliefs on stock markets," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 119-134.
    2. Rojo-Suárez, Javier & Alonso-Conde, Ana B., 2024. "Have shifts in investor tastes led the market portfolio to capture ESG preferences?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Siri Tronslien Sagbakken & Dan Zhang, 2022. "European sin stocks," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Md Safiullah & Abul Shamsuddin, 2021. "Asset pricing factors in Islamic equity returns," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 21(2), pages 523-554, June.
    5. Horn, Matthias & Oehler, Andreas, 2024. "Constructing stock portfolios by sorting on ESG ratings: Does the rating provider matter?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    6. Colonnello, Stefano & Curatola, Giuliano & Gioffré, Alessandro, 2019. "Pricing sin stocks: Ethical preference vs. risk aversion," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 69-100.
    7. Benjamin Hübel & Hendrik Scholz, 2020. "Integrating sustainability risks in asset management: the role of ESG exposures and ESG ratings," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 52-69, February.
    8. Carta, Nicola & Carta, Matteo & Rigoni, Ugo, 2024. "The countdown to carbon neutrality: Implications for passive investors," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    9. Fu, Yufen & Wright, Danika & Blazenko, George, 2020. "Ethical Investing Has No Portfolio Performance Cost," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    10. Ciciretti, Rocco & Dalò, Ambrogio & Dam, Lammertjan, 2023. "The contributions of betas versus characteristics to the ESG premium," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 104-124.
    11. Weisskopf, Jean-Philippe, 2020. "Breaking bad: An investment in cannabis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    12. Lars Hornuf & Gül Yüksel, 2022. "The Performance of Socially Responsible Investments: A Meta-Analysis," CESifo Working Paper Series 9724, CESifo.
    13. Vitor Azevedo & Christopher Hoegner, 2023. "Enhancing stock market anomalies with machine learning," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 195-230, January.
    14. Pástor, Ľuboš & Stambaugh, Robert F. & Taylor, Lucian A., 2022. "Dissecting green returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 403-424.
    15. Jiaju Miao & Pawel Polak, 2023. "Online Ensemble of Models for Optimal Predictive Performance with Applications to Sector Rotation Strategy," Papers 2304.09947, arXiv.org.
    16. Mihir Tirodkar & Henk Berkman, 2023. "Are polluters shunned? A study on the institutional ownership and returns of polluter stocks," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 58(3), pages 513-537, August.
    17. Perera, Kasun & Kuruppuarachchi, Duminda & Kumarasinghe, Sriyalatha & Suleman, Muhammad Tahir, 2023. "The impact of carbon disclosure and carbon emissions intensity on firms' idiosyncratic volatility," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    18. Huber, Daniel & Jacobs, Heiko & Müller, Sebastian & Preissler, Fabian, 2023. "International factor models," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    19. David Hirshleifer & Po-Hsuan Hsu & Dongmei Li, 2018. "Innovative Originality, Profitability, and Stock Returns," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 31(7), pages 2553-2605.
    20. Ni, Yinan & Sun, Yanfei, 2023. "Environmental, social, and governance premium in Chinese stock markets," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:assmgt:v:25:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1057_s41260-024-00360-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.