IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pai/apunup/es-20-01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparación de los planes de estabilización de Argentina, Brasil y Perú

Author

Listed:
  • José Pablo Arellano

Abstract

El presente artículo se propone identificar las principales diferencias y semejanzas entre los Planes de Estabilización de Argentina, Brasil y Perú, así como también formular algunas reflexiones sobre política anti-inflacionaria. De igual modo el autor analiza el éxito inicial de dichos programas en términos de manejo de la inflación y su posterior retroceso. Concluye que el costo potencial mayor y más importante de un programa de estabilización puede medirse en términos de su impacto sobre la actividad económica y los niveles de empleo que produce. Los planes heterodoxos no han tenido esos costos para lograr la "estabilización relativa" sino que, por el contrario, han logrado expandir la producción. E, inversamente, la alternativa ortodoxa en los casos de inflación rebelde, al no actuar directamente sobre la inercia, resulta enormemente costosa.

Suggested Citation

  • José Pablo Arellano, 1987. "Comparación de los planes de estabilización de Argentina, Brasil y Perú," Apuntes. Revista de ciencias sociales, Fondo Editorial, Universidad del Pacífico, vol. 14(20), pages 3-13.
    • Handle: RePEc:pai:apunup:es-20-01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revistas.up.edu.pe/index.php/apuntes/article/download/245/247
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tokman, Víctor E., 1987. "Urban employment problems: research and policy in Latin America," ILO Working Papers 992606363402676, International Labour Organization.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pai:apunup:es-20-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giit (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiuppe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.