IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pab/rmcpee/v11y2011i1p41-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Una revisión crítica para la construcción de indicadores sintéticos = A Critical Review to Construct Composite Indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Domínguez Serrano, Mónica

    (Departamento de Economía, Métodos Cuantitativos e Historia Económica, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, de Sevilla (España))

  • Blancas Peral, Francisco Javier

    (Departamento de Economía, Métodos Cuantitativos e Historia Económica, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, de Sevilla (España))

  • Guerrero Casas, Flor María

    (Departamento de Economía, Métodos Cuantitativos e Historia Económica, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, de Sevilla (España))

  • González Lozano, Mercedes

    (Departamento de Economía Aplicada (Matemáticas), Universidad de Málaga)

Abstract

En este trabajo presentamos un análisis crítico de algunas de las técnicas más aplicadas en la práctica para obtener medidas sintéticas a partir de un sistema de subindicadores previo. En el estudio de cada metodología identificamos las ventajas e inconvenientes asociadas a cada una de ellas, prestando especial atención a cuestiones tales como la reducción de la subjetividad asociada al indicador sintético, la facilidad de interpretación de los resultados, la complejidad operacional, etc. Así, ofrecemos un documento que puede ser utilizado por parte de los analistas para elegir aquella técnica que más se adecue al estudio que pretendan realizar. This paper presents a critical analysis of some of the techniques which are applied in practice to obtain composite indicators from a previous sub-indicator system. In studying each methodology, we identify the advantages and disadvantages associated with them, paying particular attention to issues such as reducing the subjectivity associated with synthetic indicator, the ease of interpretation of results, operational complexity, etc. Therefore, we offer a document that can be used by analysts to choose the methodology that best suits their studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Domínguez Serrano, Mónica & Blancas Peral, Francisco Javier & Guerrero Casas, Flor María & González Lozano, Mercedes, 2011. "Una revisión crítica para la construcción de indicadores sintéticos = A Critical Review to Construct Composite Indicators," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 11(1), pages 41-70, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:pab:rmcpee:v:11:y:2011:i:1:p:41-70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upo.es/RevMetCuant/pdf/vol11/art48.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.upo.es/RevMetCuant/bibtex.php?id=48
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valdivieso Taborga, Carlos Eduardo, 2013. "Comparación de los modelos formativo, reflexivo y de antecedentes de evaluación estudiantil del servicio de docencia || Comparison of Formative, Reflective, and Antecedents Models of Students Evaluati," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 16(1), pages 95-120, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Indicador sintético; metodologías de agregación; multi-variante; multicriterio; composite indicator; aggregation methodologies; multivariate analysis; multicriteria analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General
    • C43 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Index Numbers and Aggregation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pab:rmcpee:v:11:y:2011:i:1:p:41-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publicación Digital - UPO (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dmupoes.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.