IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ozl/journl/v26y2023i2p163-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The contented Australian female worker: Paradox lost, paradox found

Author

Listed:
  • Alfred Michael Dockery

    (Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre)

Abstract

In a seminal 1997 paper, Andrew Clark observed that British women report higher job satisfaction than their male counterparts, despite generally holding inferior jobs. To become known as the ‘paradox of the contented female worker’, Clark argued this was due to women having lower expectations, and that the phenomenon would disappear as women’s positions in the labour market improved, a prediction supported by later evidence. This paper draws on data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey to investigate how the differential in women’s job satisfaction relative to men’s evolved in Australia between 2001 and 2022. Regression models suggest that a substantial job satisfaction premium for women gradually diminished over the first decade of this century. Unlike in Britain, however, it re-emerged and remained relatively constant from around 2013. Oaxaca-Blinder decompositions show the job satisfaction premium for women is primarily attributable to differences in the effects of variables, rather than differences in the mean characteristics of male and female workers or of their jobs. Changes in preferences relating to working hours and the effects of educational attainment on job satisfaction have particularly shaped the evolution of differences in job satisfaction by gender. Despite a convergence in the raw means of men’s and women’s job satisfaction assessments in recent years, the paradox of the contented female worker appears to be alive and well in the Australian labour market.

Suggested Citation

  • Alfred Michael Dockery, 2023. "The contented Australian female worker: Paradox lost, paradox found," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 26(2), pages 163-201.
  • Handle: RePEc:ozl:journl:v:26:y:2023:i:2:p:163-201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ajle.org/index.php/ajle_home/article/view/178/134
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    safety; job satisfaction; related public policy; discrimination; economics of gender; non-labour discrimination;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • J28 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Safety; Job Satisfaction; Related Public Policy
    • J71 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination - - - Hiring and Firing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ozl:journl:v:26:y:2023:i:2:p:163-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sandie Rawnsley (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/becurau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.