IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ovi/oviste/vxiiy2012i12p1215-1220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Importance of Improving Assessment Criteria for the Increase the Quality of Research Projects Submitted in Competitions

Author

Listed:
  • Toma Cristian Marius

    („Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University Iasi, Doctoral School of Economics, „Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy – Iasi, Department of Research Projects Management)

  • Toma Vasilica

    („Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy – Iasi Faculty of Dental Medicine)

  • Zait Dumitru

    („Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University Iasi, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Department of Management and Business Administration)

Abstract

The National Strategy for Research, Development and Innovation for the period 2007-2013 is based on the vision of the Romanian society on the role of science, technology and innovation for the development of the knowledge society in Romania, for the economical and social progress [1]. The National Plan for Research, Development and Innovation 2007 – 2013, called herein the National Plan II, represents the main instrument used to implement the National Strategy for Research, Development and Innovation. This paper presents a study which aims to analyse the assessment criteria for the research projects submitted in the competitions from 2007, 2008 and 2011 as part of the Partnership Programme and to highlight the importance of improving the assessment criteria for the increase the quality of research projects submitted in competitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Toma Cristian Marius & Toma Vasilica & Zait Dumitru, 2012. "The Importance of Improving Assessment Criteria for the Increase the Quality of Research Projects Submitted in Competitions," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 1215-1220, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:xii:y:2012:i:12:p:1215-1220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://stec.univ-ovidius.ro/html/anale/ENG/cuprins%20rezumate/volum2012p1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    assessment criteria; research; NP II; Partnership Programme;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:xii:y:2012:i:12:p:1215-1220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gheorghiu Gabriela (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoviro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.