IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/wbecrv/v39y2025i1p211-227..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Discussions about Girls’ Education Improve Academic Outcomes? Evidence from a Randomized Development Project

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher S Cotton
  • Ardyn Nordstrom
  • Jordan Nanowski
  • Eric Richert

Abstract

This article evaluates the impact that facilitated discussions about girls’ education have on education outcomes for students in rural Zimbabwe. The staggered implementation of components of a randomized education project allowed for the causal analysis of a dialogue-based engagement campaign. This campaign involved regular discussions between trained facilitators and parents, teachers, and youth about girls’ rights, the importance of attending school, and the barriers girls face in pursuing education. The campaigns increased mathematics performance and enrollment in the year after implementation. There was no similar improvement in literacy performance during this period. Longer-term data on the broader project suggest that adding additional education-focused interventions did not further increase mathematics performance and enrollment beyond what can be attributable to the dialogue campaigns alone.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher S Cotton & Ardyn Nordstrom & Jordan Nanowski & Eric Richert, 2025. "Can Discussions about Girls’ Education Improve Academic Outcomes? Evidence from a Randomized Development Project," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 39(1), pages 211-227.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:39:y:2025:i:1:p:211-227.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/wber/lhae021
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:39:y:2025:i:1:p:211-227.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wrldbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.