IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/wbecrv/v39y2025i1p143-163..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Gendered Impact of Digital Jobs Platforms: Experimental Evidence from Mozambique

Author

Listed:
  • Sam Jones
  • Kunal Sen

Abstract

This study examines the impact of digital labor-market platforms on jobs outcomes using a randomized encouragement design embedded in a longitudinal survey of Mozambican technical-vocational college graduates. We differentiate between platforms targeting formal jobs, where jobseekers direct their search, and informal tasks, where clients seek workers. Our analysis reveals statistically insignificant intent-to-treat and complier-average treatment effects for headline employment outcomes in the full sample. Notably, while the average male moderately benefits from platform usage, women do not. Rather, they are less responsive to the encouragement nudge, and female treatment compliers report higher reservation wages and lower job search. This suggests digital platforms can inadvertently perpetuate gender disparities in labor markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Sam Jones & Kunal Sen, 2025. "The Gendered Impact of Digital Jobs Platforms: Experimental Evidence from Mozambique," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 39(1), pages 143-163.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:39:y:2025:i:1:p:143-163.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/wber/lhae019
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:39:y:2025:i:1:p:143-163.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wrldbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.