IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/sscijp/v28y2025i1p852-71..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural fluency required? Interrogating ethnocentrism in the employment of white-collar Asian migrants in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Hilary J Holbrow
  • Hao Liang

Abstract

Scholars contend that Japanese firms hold white-collar foreign workers to a high bar for assimilation. This model of the ethnocentric firm suggests that Japan’s growing number of foreign-educated white-collar migrants should face steep labor market penalties compared to migrants educated in Japan because they have had fewer opportunities to familiarize themselves with Japanese working styles and norms. We test this hypothesis using a sample of 546 Asian white-collar foreign workers. However, we find that, robust to controls for compositional differences in the foreign- and Japan-educated migrant populations, foreign-educated migrants earn more. Since wage penalties for foreign degrees are ubiquitous in other national contexts, this finding counterintuitively implies that, at least in evaluation and rewards, Japanese firms may be less ethnocentric than the global norm.

Suggested Citation

  • Hilary J Holbrow & Hao Liang, 2025. "Cultural fluency required? Interrogating ethnocentrism in the employment of white-collar Asian migrants in Japan," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 852-871.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:28:y:2025:i:1:p:852-71.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ssjj/jyaf001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:28:y:2025:i:1:p:852-71.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ssjj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.