IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/sscijp/v27y2024i1p77-90..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does cooperation with multiple actors diffuse the government’s responsibility in the implementation of COVID-19 measures?

Author

Listed:
  • Tatsuya Iseki
  • Sohei Shigemura
  • Shun Ikeda
  • Hideo Ishima

Abstract

To manage the COVID-19 pandemic, the Japanese government has cooperated with multiple actors, such as experts, prefectural governments, and medical professionals, who generally attract limited attention in non-crisis times. While cooperation with such actors allows the central government to mobilize knowledge and utilize resources it does not have, such collaboration could diffuse the responsibility of COVID-19-related measures onto other actors. To empirically test this conjecture, we conducted an online survey experiment prior to the 2021 Japanese general election. It investigated whether the government’s cooperation with experts, prefectural governors, medical professionals, and the International Olympic Committee obscured its responsibility in the declaration of stay-at-home advisories, securing of beds, and conducting of the 2020 Summer Olympic Games. The results deliver no evidence that informing people of the influence of any actor diffused the government’s responsibility for the implementation of COVID-19-related measures. The findings of this study imply that the Japanese people held the national government accountable even during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatsuya Iseki & Sohei Shigemura & Shun Ikeda & Hideo Ishima, 2024. "Does cooperation with multiple actors diffuse the government’s responsibility in the implementation of COVID-19 measures?," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 77-90.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:27:y:2024:i:1:p:77-90.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ssjj/jyad027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:27:y:2024:i:1:p:77-90.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ssjj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.