IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/sscijp/v23y2020i1p37-64..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tax Burdens in Japan and South Korea: Measurement Using Average Effective Tax Rates

Author

Listed:
  • Sung Ho PARKAssociate Professor

Abstract

Although tax policies in Japan and South Korea have notably changed over recent decades, few studies have thoroughly examined the nature of these changes. Building on the average effective tax rates developed by Mendoza et al. (1994) and OECD researchers (Carey and Tchilinguirian 2000; Carey and Rabesona 2003) and extending and revising their original data, this study analyzes the structure of tax burdens in these two countries over 1995–2015. In particular, it examines the scholarly claim that taxation in these countries has become increasingly neoliberal over recent decades. The author finds insufficient evidence to support fiscal neoliberalism as race-to-the-bottom cuts in public taxation. Future studies may conduct in-depth comparative and case analyses to better understand the nature of the new tax structure emerging in these countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Sung Ho PARKAssociate Professor, 2020. "Tax Burdens in Japan and South Korea: Measurement Using Average Effective Tax Rates," Social Science Japan Journal, University of Tokyo and Oxford University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 37-64.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:23:y:2020:i:1:p:37-64.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ssjj/jyz050
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:sscijp:v:23:y:2020:i:1:p:37-64.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ssjj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.